Max is a better analyst, Larry is a better speaker
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Max Kellerman vs prime Larry Merchant
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Bengali Boxer View Postfor me max kellerman is better he has better knowledge of boxing and he ain't a hater or as bias as larry merchant who seems to me only wants to see bar room brawls instead of pure boxing if merchant can't appreciate mayweather's boxing then maybe he should just retire and watch kimbo slice on youtube"THE GREATEST VICTORY IN THE HISTORY OF MMA!!!!!" -- The Announcer
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cash Cow View PostLarry talks like he keeps forgetting what he wants to say
Larry is not as good as Max when it comes analyzing fights. He is biased against pure boxing and only respects a toe to toe fight. Max is unbiased and truly appreciates all styles and fighters and knows what he is talking about to the T.
Max better analyst, Larry better speaker.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bengali Boxer View Postfor me max kellerman is better he has better knowledge of boxing and he ain't a hater or as bias as larry merchant who seems to me only wants to see bar room brawls instead of pure boxing if merchant can't appreciate mayweather's boxing then maybe he should just retire and watch kimbo slice on youtube
Comment
-
In all honesty, I believe that Kellermen has a better knowledge of the sport, but Merchant has a better way of putting opinions out there.
I do dislike that Kellermen has an tendancy to oversell things, sometimes.
Case and point, Kellermen will compare a modern situation to that of the passed as if they are even comparable at this point. One has stood the test of time, the other is happening as we speak. Whereas Larry allows his comparisons to remain modern and leaves it at that. Kellermen sometimes comes across as someone who wants to prove his knowledge of boxing, whereas Larry feels comfortable with who he is, for better or worse.
I will say, however, that Kellermen can appreciate a boxer just as much as he's able to appreciate a brawler, something that Merchant simply can't do. Larry seems to go for the hype job or the exciting fighter, 80 percent or so of the time. He doesn't appreciate a slower, but still interesting fight and will make snappy remarks about a fight as if what they're doing in the ring is easy. He often times doesn't allow even for a few feeling out rounds before making some comment about how boring the fight is.
He's better for quotes, but what Kellermen says usually makes the better point for me, personally.
Both are quality in there own right, however at this point, I like to hear Merchant because he does love the sport, but Kellermen seems to add more to the broadcast at this point.
Comment
-
I'm sick of sky sports commentators catching up on stuff that the HBO commentators aren't able to see, and in my opinion thats more due to Merchant slowing down the whole crew. He's got to go.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Championart View PostHowever people feel and respect his words. He is an eloquent speaker despite that. Max sounds like broken down engine with his stuttering and while he is a better analyst his words aren't felt like Larry's.
Larry is not as good as Max when it comes analyzing fights. He is biased against pure boxing and only respects a toe to toe fight. Max is unbiased and truly appreciates all styles and fighters and knows what he is talking about to the T.
Max better analyst, Larry better speaker.
Comment
Comment