Boxing Vs Brawling as a fan of the sport...what do yo prefer???

[QuebecSTAR2]

Same goes for Golovkin, Matthysse and all the guys people like to label brawlers.

I can't really think of that many brawlers at the top level of the sport, Sakio Bika is the only one who comes to mind. I guess Marcos Maidana fits the bill too, although he has refined his game to some degree.

well said.

[Mayabang]

Also prior to Mayweather's WW career, he knocked out a good bit more than half his opponents.

^this

I think to prevent biased responses, this poll should've been a choice between old Floyd vs. New Floyd. Defenitely would've went for old Floyd since he actually finishes his opponents.

[-Kev-]

Boxing. I have no interest in face first brawling.

I give exceptions to guys like JMM, because when he does it, there is some intelligence behind it.

I have yet to see the Marquez-Vazquez trilogy, only highlights, and I have only seen highlights of Gatti-Ward. The thing is, I don't want to see them. I'm not interested, I don't care about those fights, I will never be convinced into watching them.

A good boxing/brawl hybrid like the Marquez-Pacquiao 4 fight series is a must see.

[Bushidō]

I like boxer puncher types.

[SD180sx]

I would say both as long as its an entertaining fight.

[FeFist]

It's like asking what I prefer, peanut or jam. Both ( Jam/Boxing).

[HanzGruber]

It depends. If its a rios or a rigondeaux? Then Rigo. But a zab Judah or a Tyson? Then Tyson.

[bojangles1987]

I like the guys who box their opponents silly then beat them down.

[Biolink]

Voted Brawling, but meant Boxing.

[extracurRICular]

Voted Brawling, but meant Boxing.

the first choice is always the right choice........