Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should Amir Khan Be Considered Pacquiao's Superior By Default?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Should Amir Khan Be Considered Pacquiao's Superior By Default?

    Pacquiao KOd 3 times, lost 6
    Khan KOd 2 times, lost 3

    Pacquiao first knocked out by Torrecampo who had a 25% KO Ratio at the time with 4 defeats and 5 draws.

    Khan first knocked out by Prescott who had a 98% KO Ratio at the time and was undefeated.

    Pacquiao lost to Floyd Mayweather.
    Khan was very publicly avoided by Floyd Mayweather on multiple occasions.

    Pacquiao lost to Marquez.
    Marquez avoided Khan.

    Pacquiao lost to Bradley.
    Bradley avoided Khan.

    Pacquiao suspected of PED usage and was reluctant to take thorough testing for a long time.
    Khan had Olympic style testing through his whole pro career.

    Pacquiao just avoided Khan as we all know and chose to fight Bradley again for the third time.

    Manny is an excellent fighter in his own right, a legend no less, but it's fair to say at this point that he's really not quite in the same league as Amir Khan if we analyze the history honestly and deprogram ourselves from the HBO hype machine.

    Should Khan now universally be accepted as Pacquiao's superior, just like he's readily accepted as Floyd's superior at this point due to Floyd avoiding him so many times? And, if so, is it time to place Khan at the top of the P4P list by default?

  • #2


    You are a funny and consistent guy.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by FlatLine View Post
      Pacquiao KOd 3 times, lost 6
      Khan KOd 2 times, lost 3

      Pacquiao first knocked out by Torrecampo who had a 25% KO Ratio at the time with 4 defeats and 5 draws.

      Khan first knocked out by Prescott who had a 98% KO Ratio at the time and was undefeated.

      Pacquiao lost to Floyd Mayweather.
      Khan was very publicly avoided by Floyd Mayweather on multiple occasions.

      Pacquiao lost to Marquez.
      Marquez avoided Khan.

      Pacquiao lost to Bradley.
      Bradley avoided Khan.

      Pacquiao suspected of PED usage and was reluctant to take thorough testing for a long time.
      Khan had Olympic style testing through his whole pro career.

      Pacquiao just avoided Khan as we all know and chose to fight Bradley again for the third time.

      Manny is an excellent fighter in his own right, a legend no less, but it's fair to say at this point that he's really not quite in the same league as Amir Khan if we analyze the history honestly and deprogram ourselves from the HBO hype machine.

      Should Khan now universally be accepted as Pacquiao's superior, just like he's readily accepted as Floyd's superior at this point due to Floyd avoiding him so many times? And, if so, is it time to place Khan at the top of the P4P list by default?

      Comment


      • #4
        lmfaooooooo












        no

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by FlatLine View Post
          Pacquiao KOd 3 times, lost 6
          Khan KOd 2 times, lost 3

          Pacquiao first knocked out by Torrecampo who had a 25% KO Ratio at the time with 4 defeats and 5 draws.

          Khan first knocked out by Prescott who had a 98% KO Ratio at the time and was undefeated.

          Pacquiao lost to Floyd Mayweather.
          Khan was very publicly avoided by Floyd Mayweather on multiple occasions.

          Pacquiao lost to Marquez.
          Marquez avoided Khan.

          Pacquiao lost to Bradley.
          Bradley avoided Khan.

          Pacquiao suspected of PED usage and was reluctant to take thorough testing for a long time.
          Khan had Olympic style testing through his whole pro career.

          Pacquiao just avoided Khan as we all know and chose to fight Bradley again for the third time.

          Manny is an excellent fighter in his own right, a legend no less, but it's fair to say at this point that he's really not quite in the same league as Amir Khan if we analyze the history honestly and deprogram ourselves from the HBO hype machine.

          Should Khan now universally be accepted as Pacquiao's superior, just like he's readily accepted as Floyd's superior at this point due to Floyd avoiding him so many times? And, if so, is it time to place Khan at the top of the P4P list by default?
          Laughing at that

          Comment


          • #6
            Amir "King" Khan is the greatest to ever do it.


            I'm taking that bum Manny and that Cuban guy out of my avi and replacing it with Khan-Prescott.

            Comment


            • #7
              Let's compare their performances against their only common opponents, MAB and Algieri.

              Pacquiao beat MAB twice, once it was an upset in 2003 which helped Pacquiao's presence as a top 10 P4P fighter. It was his breakthrough win. But let's face it, MAB was exhausted from the fights against Kelley, Morales, Tapia, he had no rest really in terms of soft touches. Pacquiao got a great fighter, P4P, Ring champ, but exhausted and his body had through a lot of hard training for the Hamed, Morales, Tapia and Kelley fights.

              Algieri was very green and had a terrible trainer. When your trainer is lost and doesn't know what to say other than letting animals out of the cage while Algieri getting knocked down 6 times and losing handily, then you might as well not have fought Pacquiao at all.

              Let's talk about Khan vs MAB now. Leading up to the big event between Khan and MAB, Barrera had finally rested his body. He had a few soft touches and was ready to take on the best fighters again. Of course this fighter he was fighting was Amir Khan, Khan deaded that run immediately. Causing cuts on the Mexican legend, with his blazing handspeed. The fight was over before it even started. What took Pacquiao 11 rounds to do the first time, it took Khan 5 rounds and no need for any rematches.

              Khan vs Algieri speaks for itself. John David Jackson, the new trainer in Algieri's corner, Algieri now a full 147 pounder, he had more strength now, packed a bigger punch from being stablemates with the killer himself Sergiy Kovalev, and he was also more determined and down from the hype of the Provodnikov win, which ws also a curse vs Pacquiao because he kinda took Pacquiao lightly. Obviously it was a tough fight for Khan, but that was expected, as Algieri was a new man. But like every all time great before him have done, he prevailed against a tough, new and improved Algieri. Who let's face it, it's not out of the question that he was now on PED's, stunning Khan like that out of nowhere when he couldn't even make Pacuiao flinch, who had his chin softened by JMM.

              In short, Khan's wins over MAB and Algieri were greater than Pacquiao's wins over MAB and Algieri. Most will disagree, but anyone who knows anything about the background of fights, fatigue, poor trainer change, lack of rest/too man tough fights in succession, and PED's will know that MAB and Algieri were actually better fighters when they fought Khan.

              Comment


              • #8
                stop...just stop

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
                  Let's compare their performances against their only common opponents, MAB and Algieri.

                  Pacquiao beat MAB twice, once it was an upset in 2003 which helped Pacquiao's presence as a top 10 P4P fighter. It was his breakthrough win. But let's face it, MAB was exhausted from the fights against Kelley, Morales, Tapia, he had no rest really in terms of soft touches. Pacquiao got a great fighter, P4P, Ring champ, but exhausted and his body had through a lot of hard training for the Hamed, Morales, Tapia and Kelley fights.

                  Algieri was very green and had a terrible trainer. When your trainer is lost and doesn't know what to say other than letting animals out of the cage while Algieri getting knocked down 6 times and losing handily, then you might as well not have fought Pacquiao at all.

                  Let's talk about Khan vs MAB now. Leading up to the big event between Khan and MAB, Barrera had finally rested his body. He had a few soft touches and was ready to take on the best fighters again. Of course this fighter he was fighting was Amir Khan, Khan deaded that run immediately. Causing cuts on the Mexican legend, with his blazing handspeed. The fight was over before it even started. What took Pacquiao 11 rounds to do the first time, it took Khan 5 rounds and no need for any rematches.

                  Khan vs Algieri speaks for itself. John David Jackson, the new trainer in Algieri's corner, Algieri now a full 147 pounder, he had more strength now, packed a bigger punch from being stablemates with the killer himself Sergiy Kovalev, and he was also more determined and down from the hype of the Provodnikov win, which ws also a curse vs Pacquiao because he kinda took Pacquiao lightly. Obviously it was a tough fight for Khan, but that was expected, as Algieri was a new man. But like every all time great before him have done, he prevailed against a tough, new and improved Algieri. Who let's face it, it's not out of the question that he was now on PED's, stunning Khan like that out of nowhere when he couldn't even make Pacuiao flinch, who had his chin softened by JMM.

                  In short, Khan's wins over MAB and Algieri were greater than Pacquiao's wins over MAB and Algieri. Most will disagree, but anyone who knows anything about the background of fights, fatigue, poor trainer change, lack of rest/too man tough fights in succession, and PED's will know that MAB and Algieri were actually better fighters when they fought Khan.
                  lol.........

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The delusion is thick in this thread.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP