Did Ronnie Nathanielsz sign a contract stating he has to refer to Manny as..

[Agent Mulder]

..the "fighter of the decade" and "eight time world champion", simultaneously, in EVERY SINGLE article he writes? Serious question. The time he doesn't write that when talking about manny, in ANY article, doesn't exist. Don't believe me? Check for yourselves.

[J-H]

Ronnie had Marquez winning their last fight.

[J-H]

Ronnie had Marquez winning their last fight.

BPP fought Marquez??

[J-H]

BPP fought Marquez??

No you asshat. I was talking Pac and JMM.

[gauze]

at least he doesnt call him "mega-manny" and other deep-throated opinionated complimentary names. mike marley i think. buhhhhh!

[gauze]

Ronnie had Marquez winning their last fight.

true. he wasnt too biased with that one. i remember being shocked when i read his take on the fight

[Agent Mulder]

Ronnie had Marquez winning their last fight.

cool. now back to the matter at hand, the dude ALWAYS states the same **** over and over again. it's like, i can almost garuntee he will make those two statements. i'm not sure if he feels obligated to do so because he's a stan or because he's not a good journalist or because it's part of his job. it's almost as if he's trying to remind us every time he writes.

[shade darkar]

he isnt an 8 time world champ anyway. since when has the ibo counted as a major title?

[gauze]

pacquiao also gets a 10-8 round in the article because of 4 time trainer of the year freddie roach. or however many times it was.

[Blue Mercury]

at least he doesnt call him "mega-manny" and other deep-throated opinionated complimentary names. mike marley i think. buhhhhh!

LMAO