Some clowns on here claim that fighters like Lara and Rigo are better for boxing because they have more boxing skills.. Myself I like Exciting fights like Rios VS Alvarado and Guerrero Vs Berto over Lara VS Martysorian and Rigo VS Marroquin... It is good to be technical and show skills but use the skills to take out your opponent and not put the fans to sleep like Lara and Rigo do..
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What fights are better for boxing Berto Vs Guerrero and Rios VS Alvarado or??
Collapse
-
I like seeing both, although I would readily admit fights are easier for the public as a whole to enjoy rather than boxing contests. Still I like a good mix seeing all the different aspects the sport has to offer, there are many ways to skin the cat and reach the top.
-
I like both styles and such but their a reason a mike alvardo vs Rios will draw tons of intrest where a Lara vs Vanes people can care less if it takes place.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by -SWIFT- View Postyou gotta respect the skills and the heart of any fighter who steps into the ring
i like both styles
Comment
-
Berto-Guerrero and Rios-Alvarado are not alike at all and should not be put together. There was lots of skill showed in Rios-Alvarado. That's what REAL inside fighting looks like. And it blows my mind that people were calling what was happening in Guerrero-Berto inside fighting. No, that's called illegal wrestling.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MVOLT View Postlara and rigo are very boring mostly due to the fact they don't throw many punches they have very poor workrate
also donaire and canelo TKO them respectively
Comment
Comment