CLEAR conclusion about the Hopkins/Calzaghe/Jones drama !

[hishaam15]

But did Woods deserve a shot at Jones? That was the question. He probably deserved one less than Calzaghe, mandatory or not.

Hopkins can go ahead and cite money reasons, but actions speak louder than words, especially when the fight you turn down could have made you far more money than the one you took instead. Morade Hakkar, man... now there's a name who's on everyone's lips.

Yeah Woods was overmatched, but Roy just wanted to see where he was in that fight before moving up to HW to fight Ruiz...


about Hopkins, he probably only took Calzaghe because he wanted to stay busy, he was tying to chase a Roy rematch at the ime but it never came... then Hopkins backed out of a calzaghe fight because the risk-reward ratio was more dangerous than a hakkar fight... i think he only took hakkar because he was struggling to find an opponent at the time