Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

***** did not layout the blueprint for PAC to beat Flattened

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ***** did not layout the blueprint for PAC to beat Flattened

    Some of y'all have got some nerves(or lack of brain cells) to think that ***** laid out the strategy for PAC to emulate on how to beat Flattened.

    First off, ***** and PAC have two completely different approach to the fight game. Second, PAC is a southpaw, the angles and positioning are completely diffferent. The punch combos are different.

    How the hell could you think that PAC followed *****'s lead to beat Flattened when everything they do is the complete f**kin' opposite ?

    They only thing that PAC and ***** had in common when they fought Flattened was that Flattened simply did not belong in that ring. It could've been PAC that Flattened fought first and the result would've been the same.
    Last edited by 1 on 1; 04-15-2010, 06:54 AM.

  • #2
    wot the fuck are you on about

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by british_fan View Post
      wot the fuck are you on about
      lol, i was thinking the same. the title does not even make sense!!!!!!!!!!

      Comment


      • #4
        what the fcuk is beat flattened?????????/

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by 1 on 1 View Post
          Some of y'all have got some nerves(or lack of brain cells) to think that ***** laid out the strategy for PAC to emulate on how to beat Flattened.

          First off, ***** and PAC have two completely different approach to the fight game. Second, PAC is a southpaw, the angles and positioning are completely diffferent. The punch combos are different.

          How the hell could you think that PAC followed *****'s lead to beat Flattened when everything they do is the complete f**kin' opposite ?

          They only thing that PAC and ***** had in common when they fought Flattened was that Flattened simply did not belong in that ring. It could've been PAC that Flattened fought first and the result would've been the same.
          Flattened? Are you talking about Hatton? YOu think that Floyd didn't lay out the blueprint for Pac to beat Hatton; is that what your talking about? If so then I agree, Pac and Floyd have completely different styles.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by AdamantiumPI View Post
            Flattened? Are you talking about Hatton? YOu think that Floyd didn't lay out the blueprint for Pac to beat Hatton; is that what your talking about? If so then I agree, Pac and Floyd have completely different styles.
            You're correct sir. And, forget about their styles for a second. The fact that their fighting stance is the complete opposite, everything ends up being different.

            Comment


            • #7
              TS is probably posting from the Phillipines.......hey im not being racist but his english is ****house and he sounds like an immature little *****

              Comment


              • #8
                they dont need to layout the blueprint. just imagine an upgraded jmm vs. pac to know how difficult pbf would be for pacman.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Rolling Stone View Post
                  TS is probably posting from the Phillipines.......hey im not being racist but his english is ****house and he sounds like an immature little *****
                  I don't know man, there's plenty of American posters who have horrible English.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Speak english bro.
                    Last edited by B.U.R.N.E.R; 04-15-2010, 09:43 AM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP