Do you agree with ESPN's P4P ranking?

[BoxingFollower]

1. Ward
2. Mayweather
3. Marquez
4. Rigondeaux
5. Klitschko
6. Martinez
7. Mares
8. Pacquiao
9. Froch
10. Donaire

Now this list is much better than the current ESPN list.

[turkas]

Yes, this is just a terrible list, everything is ass backwards lol.

No doubt man. Basically ESPN and the Ring have turned p4p rankings into a popularity contest and that's ****ing bs.

[HanzGruber]

tim prob shouldnt be on there and no way manny is #4

[LoadedWraps]

tim prob shouldnt be on there and no way manny is #4

Bradley absolutely belongs on everyone's top 10 p4p list. ~LoadedWraps

[ChampBox@PR]

1.Floyd
2.Ward
3.JMM
4.Rigo
5.Pac
6.Froch
7.Mares
8.Martinez
9.Klitchscko
10.Gonzalez(chocolatito)

[El Angel]

1.Floyd
2.Ward
3.JMM
4.Rigo
5.Pac
6.Froch
7.Mares
8.Martinez
9.Klitchscko
10.Gonzalez(chocolatito)

Definitely can't fault having Gonzalez on there.

[ChampBox@PR]

Definitely can't fault having Gonzalez on there.

That guy is a beast. Its a shame people dont pay attention to smaller weight classes

[Pockets]

No I don't.

[toshmurph]

It's not a bad list, order is a bit off IMO but that what you get when put to a vote...

Mares should be in instead of Bradley, and I'd also like to see Chocolatito in there also until we see how Nonito rebounds in his next few fights.

But at the end of the day P4P is just fantasy so who gives a ****?

[toshmurph]

C@cique@PR;13634667]1.Floyd[/email]
2.Ward
3.JMM
4.Rigo
5.Pac
6.Froch
7.Mares
8.Martinez
9.Klitchscko
10.Gonzalez(chocolatito)

I like Froch but #6? Bit too high!