Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who has the better legacy between Pacquiao and Duran?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    pac has a better legacy, but only because it's too easy to grab championships today

    Comment


    • #12
      Duran.................

      Comment


      • #13
        To be honest Roberto Duran is indeed overrated old fighter like many old fighters. Even boxers like Kirkland Laing, Wilfredo Benitez easily beat him, not to mention that Hearns KTFO him in two rounds. Floyd and Pacquiao has better resume than Duran by far. Duran had a great run an LW, but 99% of his opponents were cab drivers, he beat only 2 champions at LW and ironically one of them had beaten him before.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post
          pac has a better legacy, but only because it's too easy to grab championships today
          thats the reason he doesnt have a better legacy.....**** paper belts..names make the resume

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Instinto View Post
            To be honest Roberto Duran is indeed overrated old fighter like many old fighters. Even boxers like Kirkland Laing, Wilfredo Benitez easily beat him, not to mention that Hearns KTFO him in two rounds. Floyd and Pacquiao has better resume than Duran by far. Duran had a great run an LW, but 99% of his opponents were cab drivers, he beat only 2 champions at LW and ironically one of them had beaten him before.
            he would ko alot of people in 2 rounds..

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post
              pac has a better legacy, but only because it's too easy to grab championships today
              Legacy is not all about belts.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Instinto View Post
                To be honest Roberto Duran is indeed overrated old fighter like many old fighters. Even boxers like Kirkland Laing, Wilfredo Benitez easily beat him, not to mention that Hearns KTFO him in two rounds. Floyd and Pacquiao has better resume than Duran by far. Duran had a great run an LW, but 99% of his opponents were cab drivers, he beat only 2 champions at LW and ironically one of them had beaten him before.


                Comment


                • #18
                  and floyd nor manny has a better resume.......................get real...

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by LarryX2011 View Post
                    thats the reason he doesnt have a better legacy.....**** paper belts..names make the resume
                    I can assure you that Pacquiao beat much more HOFers and champions. You might say that Duran beat Leonard that's why his resume is better, but one name doesn't make any resume and he lost to the same Leonard next fight.

                    Ken Norton and Joe Frazier beat Muhammad Ali. Does it make their resume better than Muhammad Ali's resume? Because they have Ali's name, But Ali himself has only Fraziers and Foremans in his resume.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Duran cleaned out lightweight for an entire decade, took Leonard's 0, beat Iran Barkley, Davey Moore, hung in their with Hagler as a fat welterweight...

                      Pacquiao's great but come on. Duran's a top 5 p4p all timer. Pacquiao's top 30-15.

                      Duran has some ugly losses on there but you have to remember that those were way past his prime. He was 83-1 after he beat Leonard. And past his prime, he still had some amazing moments.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP