Prime Bernard Hopkisn vs Carl Froch. Who wins?

[tanibanana]

Prime Froch -vs- late 30's Bernard Hopkins

I'd still go for B-Hop..

[street bully]

Better question is can Froch win a round against this 45 year old version of Hopkins?

[Allucard]

B-Hop would do to Froch what he did to Mercado in the rematch. Matter fact screw that, Mercado had much better hand speed then Froch and wasn't as robotic, I can't express how bad Froch would get beaten. Anyway, I like Froch. We need boxers who talk ****, especially those who aren't that talented. It's funny because I'm rooting for Dirrell or Froch to win it.

True that. I don't know why it bothers people so much when a fighter talks ****. In their line of business, the ones who don't back it up soon shut up. What's wrong about talking **** about your next opponent and then whoop his ass? Exception made to the last Froch fight as he really lost that and we've seen a more quiet Froch since. Otherwise he too backs **** up.

[Sir Tom Jones]

Better question is can Froch win a round against this 45 year old version of Hopkins?

Sure he can.








































In Nottingham.

[Earl-Hickey]

Better question is can Froch win a round against this 45 year old version of Hopkins?

Better question is who wins in a WWE match, now thats something id watch!

[street bully]

Better question is who wins in a WWE match, now thats something id watch!

I would go with Hopkins.

[-EX-]

Yeah, don't worry everyone makes mistakes.

it is only a matter of time before carl's 0 goes.

Should have went already

[Rocker]

Hopkins would win by decision.

[daggum]

hopkins is vulnerable to the uppercut. some bum named mercado put him down and nearly out with one. froch has the best uppercut in boxing. he could throw it from 20 feet out and still land on hopkins. easy fight for froch.

[intoccabile]

Lmao.. you guys are clowns.

This is the easiast fight Hopkins could take at 168-175.. he is ALL wrong for Froch.

Lmao