Without stating the bleedin' obvious Froch v Groves is a terrific fight; it matches a proven, battle-hardened veteran world champion (showing no visible signs of decline) with a far younger, undefeated and very talented contender who has been 'earmarked' as a potential 'world champion-in-waiting' for several years now.
A couple of rhetorical questions to (hopefully) get us all in the mood....
Is this a colossal tactical mistake by Groves and Booth or have they got the timing of this fight just right? George is now more than ready and it is time to make the charge.
Is Groves actually Carl's nightmare opponent right now? Fast, young, slick and a properly hard-hitter from all angles and potentially a far harder proposition than a recycled Kessler or the always over-rated Bute.
How does Groves actually win this one? By sticking, moving and doing his own impersonation of Andre Ward (never allowing Froch to find a rhythm or plant his feet and punch hard) or does he meet power-with-power.
A couple of rhetorical questions to (hopefully) get us all in the mood....
Is this a colossal tactical mistake by Groves and Booth or have they got the timing of this fight just right? George is now more than ready and it is time to make the charge.
Is Groves actually Carl's nightmare opponent right now? Fast, young, slick and a properly hard-hitter from all angles and potentially a far harder proposition than a recycled Kessler or the always over-rated Bute.
How does Groves actually win this one? By sticking, moving and doing his own impersonation of Andre Ward (never allowing Froch to find a rhythm or plant his feet and punch hard) or does he meet power-with-power.
Comment