Originally posted by soul_survivor
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why is Kovalev getting rounds 3, 4, and 5 by default? Because of the KD?
Collapse
-
Thank you! You have people *****ing about round 10 and 12 but don't acknowledge rounds 3 to 5 were also close competitive rounds
Comment
-
Originally posted by soul_survivor View Postso you gave Kovalev 4 rounds? lol
Ward - 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12
Kovalev - 1, 2, 4, 6, 10
Round 3 is my big swing round. But even then the only clear rounds are 1, 2, for Kovalev and round 7, and 9 for Ward, every other round could be scored either way. So it really was a ***** to score.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mlac View Postagreed, including professional judges.
10 point must is a flawed system also.
How many people can watch a fight onetime through like they are taking a test without previously seeing it. Judging fights is not a fun exercise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sunny31 View PostI'm starting to get that impression. People are so emotional and extreme. There is a middle ground here guys, it was a close fight. This fight reminds me a little bit of Mosley-Cotto, everyone was going ape **** here for the scoring of that fight, arguing, name calling.
I thought Cotto won - but I could see how people thought Mosley did.
This fight was extremely hard to score, probably even more difficult than that fight.
I gave up a long time ago because scoring fights in a proper manner requires real effort, and to put that effort in give those thoughts only be to told wrong by some dude who was drinking paying 1/3 the amount of attention who is essentially just agreeing with others who did the same thing.
If you want to enjoy fights don't score, best thing I ever did was stop.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View PostIt is not that easy, and the judges still to me don't have a great angle. Which can normally explain seeing a different round or fight from the others.
10 point must is a flawed system also.
How many people can watch a fight onetime through like they are taking a test without previously seeing it. Judging fights is not a fun exercise.
So you got corruption on the undercard, now take the main event, with 100X more money and stake involved.
Surely logic dictates that if corruption is involved on a low money fight involving a prospect and perez a guy who's on his way out. There must be corruption on the main card too...
I watch alot of boxing and i try to wash over all the robberies i have seen, but its happening week in, week out, year in year out.
All incompetent judges with a bad view? i'd like to think so, but i think we all know deep down boxing is rotten to the core. But we tend to gloss over it because we love the sport and give the benefit of the doubt.
I didnt score the Curtis steven's fight but looks like he got a gift there too.
So you can make the argument that 3/3 fights on the card all had corruption involved.
Now that is a slight stretch as the main event was a closeish fight. But to me a closeish fight can still be a robbery/corrupt if the wrong man one.
Comment
Comment