Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

135 vs 160 which weightclass is deeper?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 135 vs 160 which weightclass is deeper?

    Which of these two is the better division?
    20
    135
    25.00%
    5
    160
    75.00%
    15

  • #2
    probably middleweight because Broner moved up

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by HalfaMill View Post
      Which of these two is the better division?
      160

      In Martinez you have one of the very few TRUE champions of the entire sport, in GGG, Sturm, Geale, Quillin, Murray and Macklin you have a crop of top, world class possible contenders and in GGG (possibly QUillin too?) you may have the next middleweight king.

      Up until last month, Barker was a legit name having beaten a very good, seasoned titlist but his body just never held up.

      I haven't even mentioned guys like Rubio, Bursak, Lee, Soliman and so on, some of whom have nearly reached the top in the past.

      135 is bare below Burns and Vazquez, there is possibly a come backing DeMarco, an untested but talented challenger in Crawford. Beltran loks tough and Abril is good but none that can excite like the top 10 or 15 at 160.

      Comment


      • #4
        160
        If you want the deepest then it's 112 by a sizable margin

        Comment

        Working...
        X
        TOP