Why is the Fighter of the Decade an Underdog and Making Less Money Than Floyd?

[LilFloyd]

so ready for action, so ready for love!

[jrosales13]

98% of the guys on thos forum didnt know who Floyd was until he fought Oscar. A bunch of fucking noobs.

you base that percentage on what source?

I think that numbers is accurate. And, 75% of that are Floyd fans. I know cuz I have debated against all of them at one point... And, I swear they either started watching when Floyd beat Gatti or when he beat Oscar. M.I.C(TS) is one of the guys who is just a noob.

[M.I.C.]

jrosales, dont talk **** for the sake of talking ****, I was at Tyson-Spinks so dont ever use M.I.C. and Noob in the same sentence.

[jrosales13]

jrosales, dont talk **** for the sake of talking ****, I was at Tyson-Spinks so dont ever use M.I.C. and Noob in the same sentence.

I am going to use the word noob until you find out a pure boxer is

[goldenglove2]

Oh you only focused on the purse split part, nevermind why the so called Fighter of the Decade is the underdog hunh? If Pac is greater and better than Floyd then why is he the underdog?

he's the underdog because he is smaller and started his pro career at 106 and Floyd has fought as highas 154........its not that difficult, kinda a no brainer.

[Bhopreign]

Can anyone answer the question? I mean certainly the so called fighter of the decade should be an overwhelming favorite to beat the semi retired, runner, one punch at a time, no heart, no chin, feather fisted, IRS troubled, almost KO'd by Shane Mosley, Gayweather? Right?

Simple, because he's not the fighter of the decade.