Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Did Floyd Mayweather use PED's? (simple answer for an OG member please)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
    Wada has no role in pro boxing, dumbfcuk. Usada is not supervised by anyone when hired by a fighter or promoter.
    In other words you don't know what the **** you are talking about.

    You have no idea what it means to be considered a WADA signatory. Admit it. Smh
    You are proof that pact@rds are stupid people in general incapable of processing necessary information to form their own opinions.



    There's really no question if they broke the retroactive Tue rule. They did, you just have to read the rules, it's open and shut

    Here is a link to the ISTUE -( international standard for therapeutic use exemptions.)

    https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resource...emptions-istue

    Now for the rules:

    4.3 An Athlete may only be granted retroactive approval for his/her Therapeutic
    Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method (i.e., a retroactive TUE) if:



    a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was
    necessary;

    or

    b. Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or
    opportunity for the Athlete to submit, or for the TUEC to consider, an
    application for the TUE prior to Sample collection;

    or

    c. The applicable rules required the Athlete (see comment to Article 5.1) or
    permitted the Athlete (see Code Article 4.4.5) to apply for a retroactive
    TUE;

    or

    d. It is agreed, by WADA and by the Anti-Doping Organization to whom the
    application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness
    requires the grant of a retroactive TUE



    So there are the rules that you told me to read. Explain how USADA broke the rules again????


    And even if somehow your sick twisted pact@rd logic prevents you from understanding these rules and still think the tue is invalid .....




    8.6 The WADA TUEC shall reverse any grant of a TUE that does not comply with
    the Article 4.1 conditions.
    Where the TUE reversed was a prospective TUE (rather
    than a retroactive TUE), such reversal shall take effect upon the date specified by
    WADA (which shall not be earlier than the date of WADA’s notification to the
    Athlete). The reversal shall not apply retroactively and the Athlete’s results prior to
    such notification shall not be Disqualified. Where the TUE reversed was a
    retroactive TUE, however, the reversal shall also be retroactive.


    In red for you.

    STILL WAITING FOR WADA TO REVERSE THE TUE.

    Stupid pact@rd.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
      Right... that's why it took 3 months for only Hauser to publicize it yet not a single soul did even after Kevin Iole adddressed it on May 22nd. Lol

      Dont make it too easy
      And what does that have to do with the topic, birdbrain? Just read the Tue rule

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Dosumpthin View Post
        In other words you don't know what the **** you are talking about.

        You have no idea what it means to be considered a WADA signatory. Admit it. Smh
        You are proof that pact@rds are stupid people in general incapable of processing necessary information to form their own opinions.




        Here is a link to the ISTUE -( international standard for therapeutic use exemptions.)

        https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resource...emptions-istue

        Now for the rules:

        4.3 An Athlete may only be granted retroactive approval for his/her Therapeutic
        Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method (i.e., a retroactive TUE) if:



        a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was
        necessary;

        or

        b. Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or
        opportunity for the Athlete to submit, or for the TUEC to consider, an
        application for the TUE prior to Sample collection;

        or

        c. The applicable rules required the Athlete (see comment to Article 5.1) or
        permitted the Athlete (see Code Article 4.4.5) to apply for a retroactive
        TUE;

        or

        d. It is agreed, by WADA and by the Anti-Doping Organization to whom the
        application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness
        requires the grant of a retroactive TUE



        So there are the rules that you told me to read. Explain how USADA broke the rules again????


        And even if somehow your sick twisted pact@rd logic prevents you from understanding these rules and still think the tue is invalid .....




        8.6 The WADA TUEC shall reverse any grant of a TUE that does not comply with
        the Article 4.1 conditions.
        Where the TUE reversed was a prospective TUE (rather
        than a retroactive TUE), such reversal shall take effect upon the date specified by
        WADA (which shall not be earlier than the date of WADA’s notification to the
        Athlete). The reversal shall not apply retroactively and the Athlete’s results prior to
        such notification shall not be Disqualified. Where the TUE reversed was a
        retroactive TUE, however, the reversal shall also be retroactive.


        In red for you.

        STILL WAITING FOR WADA TO REVERSE THE TUE.

        Stupid pact@rd.
        Wada are not involved in pro boxing, dummy. Why is this so hard for you to process? Guess what, they don't work for free duh

        Here's the rule, a$$wipe. No wiggle room there

        http://www.usada.org/wp-content/uplo...-Infusions.pdf

        All IV infusions and/or injections of more than 50mL (~3.4 tablespoons) per 6 hour period are prohibited at all times, both in- and out-of-competition, except for those legitimately received in the course of hospital admissions, surgical procedures or clinical investigations, without an approved Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE).
        IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
          And what does that have to do with the topic, birdbrain? Just read the Tue rule
          the topic? I see, it's nice to troll and assume Floyd was rocking TUE or IV's his entire career huh? Most people only contextualize May 2nd, 2015 and Lance Armstrong's legacy from the late 90s when EPO use wasn't monitored. lol

          as long as WADA's guidelines have always stated real life scenarios where conditions for its use must be justified, then who is to against logical medical practices? oh wait, is it because Floyd submitted the paper work after even though it was already acknowledged?

          people can cherry pick "deadlines" as a reasonable source for doping yet tests still came back negative.

          or did Mayweather use PEDs his entire career? Define Floyd's fight against Oscar and Pac. What are the differences in style and performance? Is Bhop or Foreman miraculous examples as the only boxers still going after 40?

          easy breezy mate. keep em coming. hand me some of that Toradol too

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
            the topic? I see, it's nice to troll and assume Floyd was rocking TUE or IV's his entire career huh? Most people only contextualize May 2nd, 2015 and Lance Armstrong's legacy from the late 90s when EPO use wasn't monitored. lol

            as long as WADA's guidelines have always stated real life scenarios where conditions for its use must be justified, then who is to against logical medical practices? oh wait, is it because Floyd submitted the paper work after even though it was already acknowledged?

            people can cherry pick "deadlines" as a reasonable source for doping yet tests still came back negative.

            or did Mayweather use PEDs his entire career? Define Floyd's fight against Oscar and Pac. What are the differences in style and performance? Is Bhop or Foreman miraculous examples as the only boxers still going after 40?

            easy breezy mate. keep em coming. hand me some of that Toradol too
            I dunno when he started cheating but he's obviously been cheating while pretending to be boxings #1 PED buster

            Just read the rule, I posted it above. Clearly Floyd wasn't eligible for a retroactive Tue, only got it cause Usada was on his payroll

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by ИATAS View Post
              What I'm saying is that unless there is proof Mayweather or Pacquiao used PEDs all this talk is pure speculation. There's little point arguing back and forth making accusations without actual data to back it up.
              Totally agree.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by lfc19titles View Post
                Only a fool will say no or a bit hugger

                They took a medicine that hides drugs, the same medicine used by drug users like lance Armstrong to hide positive tests

                Not only that but he took 14
                Times the required limit of that Iv drip given to someone in critical condition in the Fckn hospital lol

                What more red flags do you people need

                He is a cheat and his legacy is forever ruined because of it
                It's only the W̶a̶r̶d̶, Mayweather fans that stick up for him and make some bogus excuse in this day and age to think some can still be so naive to protect their precious little drug cheat.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Chrismart View Post
                  Totally agree.
                  I like how Herobando doesn't contest NATAS that there's no proof. these NSB collectives

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by ИATAS View Post
                    What I'm saying is that unless there is proof Mayweather or Pacquiao used PEDs all this talk is pure speculation. There's little point arguing back and forth making accusations without actual data to back it up.
                    Doesn't help with the fact that drug testing agencies don't make results public knowledge, USADA leading the line with this Floyd Mayweathers favour PED buddies.
                    If there is a red flag being brought up you can sure as hell more than likely guarantee that this fighter is dirty, ffs USADA don't even do all the proper testing means.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Don't know

                      But using bags IV saline when he doesn't have problems making weight makes me very suspicious that he was flushing peds out of his system

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP