Originally posted by RunW/Knives
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Did Roach make Pacquiao what he is today?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Poochiao View PostI said this before and I'm going to say it again... Roach made Pacquiao the fighter he is today and he would not be where he is today without Roach. Roach doesn't get enough credit for being a great trainer and great match maker. He made Pacquiao the offensive machine he is today. He took a one punch puncher with little skilled and made him into a complete boxer.
When have you ever seen Manny make adjustments in the ring on his own in a big fight? No way he beats guys like EM, JMM, Floyd, etc. without Roach being in his corner.
Do you think Manny beats Floyd if Buboy was the trainer?
do you think Floyd could beat Manny inside his cell?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Poochiao View PostI said this before and I'm going to say it again... Roach made Pacquiao the fighter he is today and he would not be where he is today without Roach. Roach doesn't get enough credit for being a great trainer and great match maker. He made Pacquiao the offensive machine he is today. He took a one punch puncher with little skilled and made him into a complete boxer.
When have you ever seen Manny make adjustments in the ring on his own in a big fight? No way he beats guys like EM, JMM, Floyd, etc. without Roach being in his corner.
Do you think Manny beats Floyd if Buboy was the trainer?
Kobe is **** without Phil Jackson, can we agree on that too?
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostI wonder what roach does to become a great trainer? He wasnt a great fighter, so to become a great trainer does he go to learn how to teach boxing school or something, or does he just spend his whole day watching fight and reading learn how to box books?
Maybe Pac could become as succesful as trainer as roach by teaching people what roach taught him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RunW/Knives View PostOf course people are going to disagree with me.
But aside from Roach's obvious training contributions.........Pacquiao started fighting less - stiff challenges as he moved up in weight Minus Marquez.
Barrera was already pretty much on the down after a career that started at 15 years old, and Morales wasn't exactly the same fighter he was at 127 after he moved up and lost that horrible beating to Rahim.
It's kind of disappointing in that Pacman never fought Jesus Chavez, but he did fight some great opponents on the road up namely I thought his wins over Ledwaba, Julio, and Lucero were outstanding.
He moved up after the second Marquez fight to 147 then fought a Past prime DLH who was outmatched, a Shocked Hatton that belonged nowhere near 147lbs, and an already shocked/chinny Cotto that was on the road back from the beating he took from Margarito.
I'm not discrediting Manny........I'm stating he's had it easy lately.
But he's still a great fighter no doubt.
Just not the P4P best..............Floyd easily is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RunW/Knives View PostOf course people are going to disagree with me.
But aside from Roach's obvious training contributions.........Pacquiao started fighting less - stiff challenges as he moved up in weight Minus Marquez.
Barrera was already pretty much on the down after a career that started at 15 years old, and Morales wasn't exactly the same fighter he was at 127 after he moved up and lost that horrible beating to Rahim.
It's kind of disappointing in that Pacman never fought Jesus Chavez, but he did fight some great opponents on the road up namely I thought his wins over Ledwaba, Julio, and Lucero were outstanding.
He moved up after the second Marquez fight to 147 then fought a Past prime DLH who was outmatched, a Shocked Hatton that belonged nowhere near 147lbs, and an already shocked/chinny Cotto that was on the road back from the beating he took from Margarito.
I'm not discrediting Manny........I'm stating he's had it easy lately.
But he's still a great fighter no doubt.
Just not the P4P best..............Floyd easily is.Last edited by whirlwind; 09-28-2010, 03:57 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RunW/Knives View PostOf course people are going to disagree with me.
But aside from Roach's obvious training contributions.........Pacquiao started fighting less - stiff challenges as he moved up in weight Minus Marquez.
Barrera was already pretty much on the down after a career that started at 15 years old, and Morales wasn't exactly the same fighter he was at 127 after he moved up and lost that horrible beating to Rahim.
It's kind of disappointing in that Pacman never fought Jesus Chavez, but he did fight some great opponents on the road up namely I thought his wins over Ledwaba, Julio, and Lucero were outstanding.
He moved up after the second Marquez fight to 147 then fought a Past prime DLH who was outmatched, a Shocked Hatton that belonged nowhere near 147lbs, and an already shocked/chinny Cotto that was on the road back from the beating he took from Margarito.
I'm not discrediting Manny........I'm stating he's had it easy lately.
But he's still a great fighter no doubt.
Just not the P4P best..............Floyd easily is.
You never thought it's easy before it happened.
Comment
-
It's the other way around really.
Pacquiao made Roach what he is today. Can't say Roach would really be as popular if weren't for training Pac.
I don't mean that Roach isn't one of the best trainers out there as he really helped Pac get him to wear he is today, but any great, offensive-minded trainer could have improved Pac with the right approach.
Someone defensive oriented like Mayweather Sr. probably wouldn't have helped Pac as much as Roach has.
Roach is a great trainer, but Pac's a natural talent and works his ass off. Some people are acting like Roach turned a no talent bum into a prizefighter.
No one can make ice cream from shit.
Comment
Comment