Bookmark Website  | Free Registration  | The Team
Boxing Champions |  Boxing Schedule |  Boxing Video  |  Boxing History   |  Pound For Pound  | Lounge  | The Wire |  Audio  | Arcade

Navigation
Go Back   Boxing Forum > Boxing Forums > Non Stop Boxing
Reply
Thread Navigation

#61
Old 05-08-2010, 05:12 AM
Prime 407
Tiger uppercut!
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,211
Rep Power: 13 Prime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond reputePrime 407 has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 10,000,027,493.85
Bank: 180,335,320,932.45
Total Points: 190,335,348,426.30
well deserved - HaglerSteelChin you're a complete joke - ROSS CALIFORNIA 
Default

Yeah not really that good a win, here's an equation for you:

Mosley + old - peds = below average win
Reply With Quote
Prime 407 is offline
Advertisements
>>>TO REMOVE THESE ADS, PLEASE REGISTER HERE FOR FREE<<<
#62
Old 05-08-2010, 09:49 PM
STRUGG
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,483
Rep Power: 0 STRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 199,929.18
Bank: 2,679,841,400.23
Total Points: 2,680,041,329.41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by - JCHING - View Post
If Pac had fought Shane and dominated, you would have a completely different view.

But Pac refused to fight Shane, even at a catchweight of 142, so we will never know.
no.......it would be a lot more entertqaaining...........but i would have called an old and inactive shane as much more dangerous fight for PAC..................................shane is old..........nothing to do who he fights..............
Reply With Quote
STRUGG is offline
#63
Old 05-10-2010, 08:45 AM
STRUGG
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,483
Rep Power: 0 STRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 199,929.18
Bank: 2,679,841,400.23
Total Points: 2,680,041,329.41
Default

bump................................
Reply With Quote
STRUGG is offline
#64
Old 05-10-2010, 08:51 AM
EDOMITESLAYER
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 170
Rep Power: 0 EDOMITESLAYER has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Points: 5,457.04
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 5,457.04
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strugg View Post
no.......it would be a lot more entertqaaining...........but i would have called an old and inactive shane as much more dangerous fight for pac..................................shane is old..........nothing to do who he fights..............
shane got on espn, challenged mayweather called him a ducker etc.

And got his ass whooped. I am sure all this talk of shane is old etc, well mayweather isnt god and cant rewind teh time clock to make him 34 years old.

Now i ask you why was pacquiao fighting clottey, when clottey has lost his last 2 fights prior?

Why would a man get a shot at a title when he loses twice?

Could you imagine the backlash from mayweather if he fought clottey next? Or if he fought nate campbell?

You guys are ****in hypocrites.
Reply With Quote
EDOMITESLAYER is offline
#65
Old 05-10-2010, 08:55 AM
STRUGG
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,483
Rep Power: 0 STRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 199,929.18
Bank: 2,679,841,400.23
Total Points: 2,680,041,329.41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EDOMITESLAYER View Post
shane got on espn, challenged mayweather called him a ducker etc.

And got his ass whooped. I am sure all this talk of shane is old etc, well mayweather isnt god and cant rewind teh time clock to make him 34 years old.

Now i ask you why was pacquiao fighting clottey, when clottey has lost his last 2 fights prior?

Why would a man get a shot at a title when he loses twice?

Could you imagine the backlash from mayweather if he fought clottey next? Or if he fought nate campbell?

You guys are ****in hypocrites.


Clottey is a legit WW......who was winning against MARG.......had a close fight/loss against Cotto............and shane was booked for BERTO.......................hope i answered your question
Reply With Quote
STRUGG is offline
#66
Old 05-10-2010, 08:58 AM
John Hue
Undisputed Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,344
Rep Power: 7 John Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Hue has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 58,458.59
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 58,458.59
Alzheimer's - Crohn's & Colitis - Cystic Fibrosis - Domestic Violence - Fibromyalgia - Leimyosarcoma - Lupus - Dick Buffman 
Default

That was a very impressive win by Floyd. IMO Moseley despite his age is well preserved and would cause all the welterweights problems. In many ways I would have prefered to have seen him fight Manny. I could see him performing really well against him. The reason Mosely did not look good was because Floyd was on top of his game and was so good it took Moseley out of his game.
Reply With Quote
John Hue is offline
#67
Old 05-10-2010, 09:00 AM
STRUGG
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,483
Rep Power: 0 STRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond reputeSTRUGG has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 199,929.18
Bank: 2,679,841,400.23
Total Points: 2,680,041,329.41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hue View Post
That was a very impressive win by Floyd. IMO Moseley despite his age is well preserved and would cause all the welterweights problems. In many ways I would have prefered to have seen him fight Manny. I could see him performing really well against him. The reason Mosely did not look good was because Floyd was on top of his game and was so good it took Moseley out of his game.
SO you dont think being 38 y/o ..........and 15 month inactive have anything to do with it??...............................im guessing youre gonna quote the MARG win now right????
Reply With Quote
STRUGG is offline
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
bshane, inactive

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Privacy Policy - Submit News - Feedback - Site Map - Advertise with Us

Copyright 2003-2014 BoxingScene LLC All rights reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.