What would you all say if Nate won?? - Page 12

talip bin osman

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnePunch

you just have to break him down. make it nasty. probably lose the first 5 rounds and hope to get the last 7. anybody can be had though if you hit them with the right shot. floyds pretty hard to hit flush though.

hopefully we all get to find out.......

dont forget, floyd turned down this fight several years ago, calling it slave wages......lol

u mean something like what saddler did to pep? saddler was younger than pep by 4 years, was bigger and like pep himself is a bonafide HOF... nate aint got any advantage over PBF man... I mean, francisco lorenzo beat him for crying out loud..

OnePunch

Quote:

Originally Posted by talip bin osman

u mean something like what saddler did to pep? saddler was younger than pep by 4 years, was bigger and like pep himself is a bonafide HOF... nate aint got any advantage over PBF man... I mean, francisco lorenzo beat him for crying out loud..

and Rusty knocked out Pac. So whats your point?

talip bin osman

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnePunch

and Rusty knocked out Pac. So whats your point?

rusty KOed MP like MP was barely outside of his puberty man! oh man! how old was campbell when lorenzo beat him? and this aint about MP man... this is about nate beating PBF... which however hard I give it a careful thought I just cant see it happening. if u are not associated with nate it will be easier to understand my point u are asking.

Ray*

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnePunch

just curious, because no matter what Nate does some idiot will always post the Peden clip, or some "expert" will talk about how after 2 rounds they "knew" Bradley was going to beat Nate, or better yet knock Nate out. LOL Like Bradley ever knocks ANYBODY out, especially someone like Nate, who has been on the floor only once in his career and it took a free shot to do that.

The hyprocacy sometimes just cracks me up. A weight drained Nate, probably at 50%, beat Funeka, but here it gets spun as "Nate struggled with a nobody even with a weight advantage". Funeka then smashes everyone's hero Guzman, and now Funeka is Godzilla around here. But he was a bum and a nobody when Nate fought him.

Anyways, so IF this fight were to somehow get made, and IF Nate were to win it, whats the excuse?

1. Floyd didnt get "up" for the fight
2. Floyd was distracted by the Pac lawsuit
3. The internet forum posters, most of who dont support the sport by buying ppv anyways, but instead make 1834 threads looking for free streams dont like him anymore
4. Floyd was overrated
5. (insert new excuse here)

And on a side note to those who can objectively debate an issue, who (realistically) between 140 and 147 would make a better fight then Nate right now? I said "realistically". That means you take shane, berto, top rank fighters, and showtime fighters out of the equation. I think that leaves Nate, Paulie, and maybe Cintron or Quintana (neither of whom are at 147)

And if you can justify Pac vs Clottey (Ben Tackie 2.0), then you can justify this matchup.

So the fight is really in discussion??? Wow am shocked!!! I expect you to stand up for your fighter like every Team does, I mean Arum backed a plaster wrapped fighter so am not surprise by your outburst but you cannot expect people to take Mayweather seriously if he actually end up fighting Nate.