The real truth about Broners resume

[Tha_Greatest]

valeros resume was just as impressive as broners for the simple fact that he has never looked like a loser at the end of a fight or 2 (Broner has to Ponce and quintero), Valero never loses any rounds while sorry midgets like rees win amazing rounds vs broner looking amazing at it too, lol, the best worthy undebatable win for broner was the same guy who was dominated first by valero.


broner is already ranked based off fights of no importance on any real resume like litzau, perez rodriguez, , escobedo who arent even gatekeepers, lol


those gatekeepers that broner beat have beaten nobody or have done nothing to be mentioned as noteworthy opposition for any kind of fighter

Originally Posted by Frank Ducketts

1. Floyd Mayweather

2. Juan Marquez

3. Nonito Donaire

4. Andre Ward

5. Sergio Martinez

6. Timothy Bradley

7. Abner Mares

8. Carl Froch

9. Lucas Matthysse

10. Adrien Broner



Just missed: Wlad K, Rios, Garcia, Maidana, Gamboa, John, Alexander, Alvarez, Dawson

today, lol, on february 22, i added this joke of a p4p list made by frank dukketts to show you how overated some fighters get by some of the more feeble minded fans, lol, broner is a extremely talented fighter but you have to prove your talent in order to be praised up there with the better fighters of today

[PBP]

Yeah because Broner fans on here are claiming that he has a world class pound for pound caliber resume.

[Jcsuper]

[Jcsuper]

Btw, what does Valero have to do with all this lol.


At 23 years old, Valero's opponent combined record was 47-67-7 and he was fighting Hernan Abraham Valenzuela and Thomas Zambrano. I will agree with you if Broner is 30 years old and still fighintg the same level of opposition but for god sake the kid is just 23 so is it possible to relax a little, he already has some decent name on his resume

[Check_hooks]

Valero vs Broner would be awesome

[Light_Speed]

Originally Posted by Tha_Greatest

Valero never loses any rounds

He lost that round in which he got dropped at 01:30

[Tha_Greatest]

Originally Posted by Jcsuper

Btw, what does Valero have to do with all this lol.


At 23 years old, Valero's opponent combined record was 47-67-7 and he was fighting Hernan Abraham Valenzuela and Thomas Zambrano. I will agree with you if Broner is 30 years old and still fighintg the same level of opposition but for god sake the kid is just 23 so is it possible to relax a little, he already has some decent name on his resume

reason i bring up valero is cause even though broner is undefeated with a pretty bad resume and 1 true undebatable victory, lol, hes already ranked as a p4p fighter while valero would neverbe mentioned as a top p4p fighter, lol, i dont know who and how can the fighters mentioned on broners resume be worthy of p4p mention for broner(Valero wasnt and his resume sukked as bad while being undefeated aswell)

[MANIAC310]

Originally Posted by PBP

Yeah because Broner fans on here are claiming that he has a world class pound for pound caliber resume.

They don't?

I've heard them claim he's a P4P fighter, and the future fighter of the decade.

Hell even on boxing radio shows they circle jerk each other at how Broner is a top P4P.

[SilverSun]

Broner > you

[Tha_Greatest]

Originally Posted by Light_Speed

He lost that round in which he got dropped at 01:30

and broner almost lost complete fights vs quintero and ponce, many people thought broner lost those fights while valero has never looked like a loser at the end of any fights