Comments Thread For: Erik Morales Facing USADA Doping Charges, Two-Year Ban

[Hiei]

Originally Posted by IdNod4u2

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/po...s&pollid=18684

Here you go idiot (75% of fans on this site believe Juan Ma wins) 2009

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/po...s&pollid=30133
Then in on this site as well 2010- 60% believe Juan Ma wins....

So please spare me your idiotic belief that Juan Ma vs Gamboa is not a 50/50 fight.

wtf those polls were from 2009 and 2010 before salido raped juanma 2x

[PRBOXINGCOTTO]

Lmaoo you think a washed up morales gave Garcia fame your stupid Garcia been getting buzz he achieved fame from the ko victory over khan

[PunchyPotorff]

For a while I've been thinking maybe this has more to do with ignorance than anything else. Maybe these doping testing organizations need to do a better job of teaching the fighters and their trainers about what's legal and what isn't? How the system works. Sure, most know and understand the guidelines, but many don't.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

He doesn't need to fight anymore anyway. But I do wonder why he is the only guy that got a 2 year ban.

[Dr Rumack]

Montoya's latest article on this mess - http://maxboxing.com/news/main-lead/...ement-part-one

Nothing that new really, except that he says there's no reference to the SAC in USADA's contracts with GBP, which potentially removes the SACs from the equation entirely:

Hardy (Jessica Hardy, swimmer, banned by USADA for clenbuterol use) immediately withdrew from the competition and began the related legal process. She ultimately received a one year suspension. Why was Erik Morales, who agreed to abide to the same WADA code under contractual agreement with USADA, allowed to fight despite his positive tests? And why did the NYSAC allow it?

Perhaps it is found in the fact that in no clause, rule or any other place found in several Master Agreement contracts obtained by Maxboxing.com, between Golden Boy Promotions and the United States Anti-Doping Agency regarding anti-doping testing for their fighters are the words “State Athletic Commission” used. No variation of those words is used. It would appear, after careful perusal of these varied versions of the same Master Agreement, that this alliance between Golden Boy and USADA potentially takes the commission completely out of the loop.

[chav]

Thanks for posting that article. Thats a potentially very interesting find in the master agreement

Perhaps it is found in the fact that in no clause, rule or any other place found in several Master Agreement contracts obtained by Maxboxing.com, between Golden Boy Promotions and the United States Anti-Doping Agency regarding anti-doping testing for their fighters are the words “State Athletic Commission” used. No variation of those words is used. It would appear, after careful perusal of these varied versions of the same Master Agreement, that this alliance between Golden Boy and USADA potentially takes the commission completely out of the loop.

Good to see Montoya still hot on the heels of GBP and their testing. He's off target in some of his articles, but he's like a terrier with this and wont let go. More power to him, the more transparency the better

[KING MEAT]

time to sign with top rank and fight in texas

[S. Saddler 1310]

meh, all we have here is a great old fighter who hadn't been in true fighting shape for years, and who hadn't made the limit in his previous bout, taking a desperate measure to make weight while fighting way past his prime and possibly in need of dough. didn't even help him in the fight because he's stronger when his withered body hasn't been subjected to the stress of cutting off those last few pounds (as we saw in the first fight with Garcia).

this doesn't tarnish his legacy in the least. we know the kind of fighter he is, a highly skilled and courageous firebrand warrior.

[WeltshmerzKO]

Originally Posted by ROSS CALIFORNIA

He doesn't need to fight anymore anyway. But I do wonder why he is the only guy that got a 2 year ban.

Same reason that boxing exists in the first place....$$$$$. They just want to appear tough on PED's by banning morales who should retire anyways, while letting other fighters who can still draw crowds continue after a short suspension. Its a dirty sport, always has been always will be....

[IdNod4u2]

Originally Posted by IdNod4u2 View Post
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/po...s&pollid=18684

Here you go idiot (75% of fans on this site believe Juan Ma wins) 2009

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/po...s&pollid=30133
Then in on this site as well 2010- 60% believe Juan Ma wins....

So please spare me your idiotic belief that Juan Ma vs Gamboa is not a 50/50 fight.

Originally Posted by Hiei

wtf those polls were from 2009 and 2010 before salido raped juanma 2x

.....I love the way these guys use the triangle theory to make their predictions make sense.

(2009) and (2010)...75% and 60% percent of the fans believes fighter A beats fighter B.
Fighter A loses to Fighter C twice. So now Fighter A cannot beat fighter B or even have a 50/50 shotGTFOH!