for me Ring magazine lost its credibility.

maduming11

..for me ring magazine lost its credibility by putting broner in p4p list and by putting marquez as Fighter of the year .. common guysss marquez just beat pacquaio and he becomes a fighter of the year . they forgot that bradley also beat pacquaio ..

larryXdavid

NoLove

I lost respect when they put Broner in p4p number 6.

Really?

Above Wladimir? Because he beat DeMarco.

Check_hooks

The Ring lost cred when they were bought by GBP

GBP whos founder lied about those pics being real and pathetically tried to cover it up

lieutenant

Damn Pacquiao fans are really butthurt that The Ring chose Marquez as fighter of the year

maduming11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Check_hooks

The Ring lost cred when they were bought by GBP

GBP whos founder lied about those pics being real and pathetically tried to cover it up

..we will rise again

HUGH JASS

so what if he was fighter of the year,bradley got a gift decision whilst marquez knocked him the fuk out,hell of a difference

Pain~Lucy

nope some of ring staff like satterfield and doug chose donaire as sure lock FOTY, i'm surprised too when pacquiao lost suddenly bronner become p4p even overtaking donaire LOL

techliam

Yea, the RING belt means **** now.

These are pretty decent rankings, check them out: http://www.tbrb.org/

Theres no P4P rankings, but we all know they don't mean anything anyway. At least divisional rankings have some objectivity to them.

maduming11

Quote:

Originally Posted by HUGH JASS

so what if he was fighter of the year,bradley got a gift decision whilst marquez knocked him the fuk out,hell of a difference

..he does not deserve that award marquez just beat pacquaio who came from lost how could you be fighter of the year if you just beat a fighter who lost his recent fight common

maduming11 Banned Join Date: Nov 2012 Posts: 50 Rep Power: 0 Points: 24,057.05 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 24,057.05 Donate	for me Ring magazine lost its credibility. ..for me ring magazine lost its credibility by putting broner in p4p list and by putting marquez as Fighter of the year .. common guysss marquez just beat pacquaio and he becomes a fighter of the year . they forgot that bradley also beat pacquaio ..

larryXdavid Curbism Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 6,409 Rep Power: 25 Points: 11,010,359,222.36 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 11,010,359,222.36 Donate

NoLove Undisputed Champion Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Britain Posts: 1,309 Rep Power: 6 Points: 597,865.98 Bank: 60,339,867.63 Total Points: 60,937,733.61 Donate	I lost respect when they put Broner in p4p number 6. Really? Above Wladimir? Because he beat DeMarco.

Check_hooks Undisputed Champion Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Where Champions Are Made Posts: 7,632 Rep Power: 27 Points: 102,834,538,590.55 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 102,834,538,590.55 Donate	The Ring lost cred when they were bought by GBP GBP whos founder lied about those pics being real and pathetically tried to cover it up

lieutenant Contender Join Date: Dec 2012 Posts: 137 Rep Power: 1 Points: 3,395.65 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 3,395.65 Donate	Damn Pacquiao fans are really butthurt that The Ring chose Marquez as fighter of the year

HUGH JASS COBRAS DADDY! Join Date: Jul 2009 Age: 28 Posts: 3,345 Rep Power: 19 Points: 4,100,639,198,980.88 Bank: 4,265,640,000,000.49 Total Points: 8,366,279,198,981.37 Donate	so what if he was fighter of the year,bradley got a gift decision whilst marquez knocked him the fuk out,hell of a difference

Pain~Lucy God of War Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Baguio City Posts: 605 Rep Power: 3 Points: 12,549.40 Bank: 1,220,465,507.92 Total Points: 1,220,478,057.32 Donate	nope some of ring staff like satterfield and doug chose donaire as sure lock FOTY, i'm surprised too when pacquiao lost suddenly bronner become p4p even overtaking donaire LOL

techliam IBF World Champion Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Aberdeen, UK Posts: 1,061 Blog Entries: 2 Rep Power: 4 Points: 1,100,033,060.74 Bank: 18,046,726,285.64 Total Points: 19,146,759,346.38 Donate	Yea, the RING belt means **** now. These are pretty decent rankings, check them out: http://www.tbrb.org/ Theres no P4P rankings, but we all know they don't mean anything anyway. At least divisional rankings have some objectivity to them.