|01-31-2013, 01:47 PM||#1|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quoted: 142 Post(s)Rep Power: 12
Total Points: 5,200,637,074.72
whos hook was better cooney or ruddock.
both guys had serious power. any thoughts?
|01-31-2013, 03:58 PM||#2|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Quoted: 5 Post(s)Rep Power: 9
Total Points: 337,717.42
id say when ruddock properly loaded up with it, it would be harder. The mix of leverage, weight, explosiveness, heavy hands, accuracy and timing guys coming in, made him a massive puncher. Id put him in the top ten heavys
|01-31-2013, 04:22 PM||#3|
Gonna be more suspicious
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Quoted: 342 Post(s)Rep Power: 88
Total Points: 511,194,975,698,352,512.00
Cooney's hook was better. A little quicker and sharper. Ruddock was the better heavyweight though.
|01-31-2013, 06:16 PM||#4|
! ! ! !
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Quoted: 1 Post(s)Rep Power: 4033
Total Points: 150,126,039,157.21
Cooney's was more consistent, and was better to the body. But, when Ruddock dipped and came up with that thing it was horrific.
Truthfully, what Ruddock threw hardest wasn't a pure hook. It was definitely a hybrid of a hook and uppercut...Cooney also threw his best from under and then up.
|05-17-2013, 03:08 PM||#6|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Quoted: 2694 Post(s)Rep Power: 134
Total Points: 10,130,437,146,821,859,328.00
my head hurts just thinking about it.
my liver, too.
cooney to the body for sure. what tall HW threw to the body like that? probably the head, too, but maybe that's just some irish bias. ruddock had a unique hook with a ton of power.
|Share This With Friends|
|cooney, hook, ruddock.|