Is Homosexuality Genetic or Choice?

[Checheni_Lamara]

This message is hidden because squealpiggy is on your ignore list.

[Freedom.]

It's genetic. They are born that way.

It's probably a choice for bisexuals, but not for gays.

[~AK49~]

Originally Posted by Russian Crushin

Its moronic because your entire post is complete bullsh1t, only a moron/religious person would write something like that (im pretty sure you're both tho). It's either "genetic or a disease". You take about how science has not really shown evidence of a guy gene but what is the most accepted scientific stance on it?

The first part just proves you're missing a few brain cells

Lets see if i can break this down further for a fellow intellectual peasant. A 'gay gene' has been extensively researched, to the conclusion that there is no gay gene. To this point, why are you misquoting me ('genetic or disease')? Its not genetic. What does that leave us with? (Hint....actually read my previous post to see).

The most accepted scientific stance? Simple, there is no fukn gay gene.

Youre just as bad as the theists you condemn, ill illustrate this more with your next post.

[squealpiggy]

Originally Posted by Checheni_Lamara

This message is hidden because squealpiggy is on your ignore list.

Congratulations on making a conscious decision to remain ignorant and stupid.

[quote]It's genetic. They are born that way.

I suppose it's a choice for bisexuals, but not for homosexuals.[.quote]

Well, embryonic. But yes, they are born that way.

In terms of attraction bisexuals are naturally attracted to both sexes. But a decision to act on your desires is technically speaking always a choice.

[Checheni_Lamara]

Originally Posted by Freedom.

It's genetic. They are born that way.

It's probably a choice for bisexuals, but not for gays.

and you'r the son of homosexual Einstain. Let they know to other doctors on the world. you revolutionized science .

[Russian Crushin]

Originally Posted by akScoundrel

Lets see if i can break this down further for a fellow intellectual peasant. A 'gay gene' has been extensively researched, to the conclusion that there is no gay gene. To this point, why are you misquoting me ('genetic or disease')? Its not genetic. What does that leave us with? (Hint....actually read my previous post to see).

The most accepted scientific stance? Simple, there is no fukn gay gene.

Youre just as bad as the theists you condemn, ill illustrate this more with your next post.

Whats the scientific stance for homosexuality, thats obviously what i was asking.

My atheistic views dont make me hate homosexuals, unlike you fine christians

[Russian Crushin]

Originally Posted by Checheni_Lamara

Russian gay spoke.

Well im not russian for 1. 2nd of all are you still mad Russia has their boot up your ass?

[Barnburner]

Originally Posted by Checheni_Lamara

and you'r the son of homosexual Einstain. Let they know to other doctors on the world. you revolutionized science .

If you mean Einstein, he had kids.

[~AK49~]

Originally Posted by Russian Crushin

You're like a modern age Charles Darwin bro

What, the earth is round? Gtfo with that sh1t, the earth is clearly not round. Look at any map, look out onto the horizon and what do you see, a flat fukn earth.....


Youre like a modern day round earth denier bro. Good thing you have learned from your mistakes and science has taught you you should keep an open mind to plausibilities....oh wait?

And youre dfferent from the theists you bash/condemn? Interesting, tell me more. Tell me, what rationalization/justification do you use to dismiss the plausibility that homosexuality is the product of a mental disorder? Other than the emotional justification of not wanting to hurt feelings.

But serious, just trying to figure out how a scientific mind works? Keep an open kind to only the plausibilities that fit into your worldview? Is that how it works? And you're different from the theists you bash how exactly??

[Barnburner]

"mental disorder"