|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Boxing Champions | Boxing Schedule | Boxing Video | Boxing History | Pound For Pound | Lounge | The Wire | Audio | Arcade |
|
Big Bad Booty Daddy Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 20,457
Rep Power: 200000
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
By Jake Donovan - The outcome appeared to be so obvious that many were already pondering Manny Pacquiao’s next move following his 12-round welterweight bout with Tim Bradley on June 9 at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. There was enough time to kill between the final bell and Michael Buffer’s reading of the official scorecards to take in the 12 rounds of action and assess Pacquiao’s performance and career.
Opinions were already being formed while awaiting the final scores to be read. Some suggested Pacquiao hadn’t looked this good since his Nov. ’09 stoppage win against Miguel Cotto. Others noted the lack of major buzz surrounding the event, wondering if interest in his career had grown a tad stale. And of course, the obligatory hypothetical questions posed on the possibility of a showdown with Floyd Mayweather ever happening. For all of the questions asked, few if any involved Tim Bradley. It was just naturally assumed that the Californian had suffered the first loss of his career. His lack of marketability was noted in the waning pre-fight buzz compared to previous Pacquiao events. The best guess was that he would simply return to the 140 lb. division, and await whatever notable assignment is offered to him. [Click Here To Read More] |
|
|
||
|
Amateur
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 0
![]() |
No argument there, decision of Pac- Bradley was on par with that of Toney-Tiberi: simply ridiculous. On a side note Pac is now involved in 1) Fight of the the year 2012 2)Robbery of the year 2012 and 3) Knockout of the year 2012( albiet on the wrong end). I guess that's some kind of achievement lol
|
|
Contender
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 1
![]() |
I strongly disagree that Huck-Povetkin was a robbery. While Huck won more rounds convincingly and inflicted more damage overall than Povetkin did, I think a reasonable case can be made that the latter edged enough close rounds to deserve the victory.
To those who consider the bout a robbery, let me know which rounds were inarguably won by Huck; I'd like to rewatch them to see if I reach the same conclusion upon another viewing. Last edited by Levity; 01-03-2013 at 03:49 AM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Privacy Policy - Submit
News - Feedback
- Site Map - Advertise
with Us
Copyright © 2003-2013 BoxingScene LLC All rights reserved.