Why are Rigo and GGG(GOLOVKIN) highly regarded by posters yet Canelo is criticized? - Page 9

Still Blazin

Face it.

Larry has a point. Great thread and good ownage.

Money Team.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burner ©

Face it.

Larry has a point. Great thread and good ownage.

Thank you sir

SoggyLungs · 03:29 PM

canelo is clearly being protected by gbp and the wbc in order to turn him into a ppv superstar and that **** is so annoying. he was pretty much handed the wbc belt when he fought matthew hatton (neither guy was even ranked top ten in the division) and since then gbp have carefully given him over-matched and undersized opponents to look good against. both rigo and golovkin turned pro much later than canelo...rigo only has 11 fights but he has done more relevant **** than canelo has in all his 40+ fights. also golovkin isn't a legit world champ and after demolishing proksa (who was ranked top ten in the division and considered a nice opponent) others in the division have shown little interest in facing him...so it's not his fault that he can't get any of the big fights. whereas canelo could easily get fights with some of the top guys in his division sicne they've all been calling him out, but he'd rather face someone like josesito lopez.

Angry Cuban

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoggyLungs

canelo is clearly being protected by gbp and the wbc in order to turn him into a ppv superstar and that **** is so annoying. he was pretty much handed the wbc belt when he fought matthew hatton (neither guy was even ranked top ten in the division) and since then gbp have carefully given him over-matched and undersized opponents to look good against. both rigo and golovkin turned pro much later than canelo...rigo only has 11 fights but he has done more relevant **** than canelo has in all his 40+ fights. also golovkin isn't a legit world champ and after demolishing proksa (who was ranked top ten in the division and considered a nice opponent) others in the division have shown little interest in facing him....

Good comment....

Beater_of_ass

I like GGG and Rigo more because their last two opponents they faced were actually from their division.

HeroBando

Surprised this is still going, it was answered on page 1. One guy is perceived as a ducker, the other 2 as being ducked. Nobody likes a ducker. Well, Larry might.

The Gambler1981

Quote:

Originally Posted by !! Shawn

You are criticizing him because he only has 11 fights? Name me someone who accomplished more in 11 fights.

I am not not even being that critical of him, I don't care that he has had 11 fights he hasn't done enough to prove anything in the sport. those 11 fights are a good start to a career but really none of the guys he beat are that meaningful other than to prove Rigondeaux is a real guy.

Rigondeaux is a hell of a fighter, I don't even need to look at who he beat in his 11 fights to tell me that because I have watched him fight.

I certainly don't give a flying fuck about who started their better or worse and that is not keeping your eye on the ball on the big picture~

viperz007

at a young age canelo is already fighting wash up fighters
imagine what he'll do at a later age :/

i dont see people overhyping rigo or ggg they are just being talked as the most feared opponents

while canelo in the other hand is still cherrypicking his way to floyd's cherrypicking farm

Money Team.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoggyLungs

canelo is clearly being protected by gbp and the wbc in order to turn him into a ppv superstar and that **** is so annoying. he was pretty much handed the wbc belt when he fought matthew hatton (neither guy was even ranked top ten in the division) and since then gbp have carefully given him over-matched and undersized opponents to look good against. both rigo and golovkin turned pro much later than canelo...rigo only has 11 fights but he has done more relevant **** than canelo has in all his 40+ fights. also golovkin isn't a legit world champ and after demolishing proksa (who was ranked top ten in the division and considered a nice opponent) others in the division have shown little interest in facing him...so it's not his fault that he can't get any of the big fights. whereas canelo could easily get fights with some of the top guys in his division sicne they've all been calling him out, but he'd rather face someone like josesito lopez.

like what???please explain who these world beaters are on his resume cause Canelos resume sh1ts on his easily

letsgobrady

Quote:

Originally Posted by MR. LARRYX

Just crazy to me and makes no sense,these 2 have done 0 and beaten no 1 yet they are praised..Canelos resume sh1t on both of theirs combined and then some

can you please explain?i doubt rigo or ggg would get much credit for beating on smaller fighters that are some what recognized

Still Blazin Banned Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 34,135 Rep Power: 0 Points: 14,210,262,018.52 Bank: 288,283,432,102.74 Total Points: 302,493,694,121.26 Donate	Face it. Larry has a point. Great thread and good ownage.

Beater_of_ass Undisputed Champion Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 2,076 Rep Power: 8 Points: 62,408.92 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 62,408.92 Donate	I like GGG and Rigo more because their last two opponents they faced were actually from their division.

HeroBando Undisputed Champion Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 2,938 Rep Power: 7 Points: 100,064,473.43 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 100,064,473.43 Donate	Surprised this is still going, it was answered on page 1. One guy is perceived as a ducker, the other 2 as being ducked. Nobody likes a ducker. Well, Larry might.

viperz007 Undisputed Champion Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 2,051 Rep Power: 9 Points: 10,000,115,361.66 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 10,000,115,361.66 Donate	at a young age canelo is already fighting wash up fighters imagine what he'll do at a later age :/ i dont see people overhyping rigo or ggg they are just being talked as the most feared opponents while canelo in the other hand is still cherrypicking his way to floyd's cherrypicking farm