Which one is the real robbery..Pac vs JMM 1,2,3 or Pac vs Bradley? - Page 4

NatiKid

well you could argue the pac man jmm fights anyway you want either fighter cant say same pac bradley. just crazy that jmm didnt have one victory before the ko, if he would of even gotten even 1 decision in the first 3 fights i would have more faith in the other decisions. but bradley pac is your answer not worth even arguing. fact that all the fights in question had pac man in em make you wonder if in every fight bob arum had judges in pocket and thats not meant to be a troll statement.

NigelBenn

Pacquiao vs Bradley without question was the real robbery.

I thought the first fight between Pacquiao vs Marquez was the clearest of the first 3 fights.

Had Pacquiao edging the 2nd fight with the third being a draw.

bojangles1987

While Marquez deserved at least one of the first 3, there is an argument either way in all three fights. There's no real argument either way with Pac-Bradley, Pac got flat out robbed.

NatiKid

honestly jmm could be 4-0 to pac man that in itself is amazing

fitefan

technically....there were no robberies imo. if you want to label one a robbery i'd go with pac/jmm 1 in favor of jmm. He dominated pac after the 1st round. yeah he landed some nice shots here and there but jmm thoroughly outclassed the overaggressive pac

the rest were very close but i felt pac barely lost all of them with the bradley fight being the best candidate to say pac won. bradley's defense and bodywork has ridiculously ignored. pac was credited with so many deflected and rolled punches it wasn't funny

had bradley thrown his punches properly as opposed to looping slaps then maybe people stop being so dismissive of what he accomplished. rewatch the fight without the hbo nuthugging and you'll see what i mean

Rome-By-Ko

Quote:

Originally Posted by bojangles1987

While Marquez deserved at least one of the first 3, there is an argument either way in all three fights. There's no real argument either way with Pac-Bradley, Pac got flat out robbed.

I can make an argument Bradley won..People throw around the word robbery far to much on this forum..Just like the word duck and exposed..

chrismart83

IMO The first 3 Pacquiao Vs Marquez fight's were close fights that could of gone either way. While Pacquiao clearly won against Bradley.

NigelBenn Undisputed Champion Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 2,028 Rep Power: 9 Points: 45,852.19 Bank: 254,467.92 Total Points: 300,320.11 Donate	Pacquiao vs Bradley without question was the real robbery. I thought the first fight between Pacquiao vs Marquez was the clearest of the first 3 fights. Had Pacquiao edging the 2nd fight with the third being a draw.

bojangles1987 bojangles1897 Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Hudson, Fl Posts: 21,694 Rep Power: 66 Points: 257,000,120,999.81 Bank: 10,471,918,957.10 Total Points: 267,472,039,956.91 Donate	While Marquez deserved at least one of the first 3, there is an argument either way in all three fights. There's no real argument either way with Pac-Bradley, Pac got flat out robbed.

NatiKid Subliminal Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Cincinnati OH Age: 27 Posts: 1,196 Rep Power: 3 Points: 21,016,026,772.71 Bank: 135,361,841,954.92 Total Points: 156,377,868,727.63 Donate	honestly jmm could be 4-0 to pac man that in itself is amazing

chrismart83 77 - 78 - 81 -84 - 05 Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: England Posts: 2,946 Rep Power: 14 Points: 4,401.60 Bank: 10,595,410,843.01 Total Points: 10,595,415,244.61 Donate	IMO The first 3 Pacquiao Vs Marquez fight's were close fights that could of gone either way. While Pacquiao clearly won against Bradley.