|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Boxing Champions | Boxing Schedule | Boxing Video | Boxing History | Pound For Pound | Lounge | The Wire | Audio | Arcade |
|
|
||
|
the opposite of pure
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: East Broward
Posts: 32,744
Rep Power: 95
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 32
Posts: 1,744
Rep Power: 0
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Being strong in the context that I gather you meant it simply means that you are strong enough to handle Ward on the inside with sh*t gets ugly and rough. We definitely saw that in the Bika fight. However I think that the key to beating anyone is not attacking strength but weakness. Taking a man out of his comfort zone and leaving him without an option to answer. I think Ward is solid, all around fighter. I don't think he is above average in any one department aside from his extraordinary will and desire to win. I think that Dirrell has a better than average chance of outboxing Ward ... depending on which Dirrell shows up. Ward can be outboxed, but the problem is that once someone begins to enjoy any surge of success with Ward, he switches his approach up and turns up his intensity, which throws his opponents off. Dirrell IMO is easily shaken up. If he could come in and use HIS OWN TOOLS AND APPROACH instead of trying to match Ward blow for blow, I think he could take it. But that's the thing: The secret to Ward's success is that he's always in the fight and he never let's his opponent get comfortable enough to dictate the pace. Andre is always hustling and finding a way to score more often than his opponent. I thought Ward was tested more in his fight against Bika than he was against both Froch and Dawson. Bika is a rough, dirty fighter who surprised Andre a couple of times in that fight. He was willing to exceed the level of aggression that Ward was bringing, even if at times dirty, and that IMO took Ward out of his comfort zone. Still, Ward found a way to win. He adjusted. That's what the science is about: Inches, making adjustments and picking your shots. The best know this and that's why they are the best. That's why they stay the best. Strength in a boxing match is only good for stamina and rough style tactics. Other than that only guys like Kirkland benefit from using "muscle strength" .. and that's mostly because they are arm punchers. A relaxed fighter will always be the best fighter. Strength just doesn't come into play in that regard with the science. Staying loose and keeping good form will always outweigh brute strength. |
|
|
the opposite of pure
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: East Broward
Posts: 32,744
Rep Power: 95
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Bika was tough for ward cuz he's strong as a horse in addition to being aggressive.
I just dont see ward having trouble cutting dirrel off and going all kessler on him. Campillo can fight inside, mid range, and a little from the outside. He doesnt have a clear weak spot that ward can immediately attack, which is what ward does. Campillo was able to back both cloud and shumenov off him and fought well coming forward, and he's obviously comfortable as a counter puncher. Its his versatility that i think will help him. Ward will bhop pascal easily. He'll rough dirrel up and fuk up his mind. Shumenov telegraphs everything, he's a big guy but a pretty bad boxer, zero versatility. |
|
Undisputed Champion
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Zamunda
Posts: 28,946
Rep Power: 73
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Campillo is a tough fight for any light heavyweight and would pose problems for Ward but I think he loses. Ward just knows how to win fights; he can get down and dirty in the trenches and beat you up, and he's got excellent ring generalship so, like a Roy Jones, he gives off the appearance (to go along with the reality) of being the superior skilled fighter. Campillo is really good but I think Ward is a bit too much.
Dirrell is the wildcard but we have no idea how good he is at this stage and I didn't think he could beat Ward even before he went on a furlough. Ward isn't perfect but he's probably the best fighter in the world right now. |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 32
Posts: 1,744
Rep Power: 0
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Personally, I like to see how well a fighter adjusts to new weight classes before I start running my mouth.
I mean even with Roy Jones and Floyd Mayweather, I was a big fan but I kept quiet during those moments when they still weren't established at new divisions. Claiming what Ward could do at 175 IMO is a fool's errand. We don't know what he can do and we don't know how well he will be able to sustain his style with the extra weight. Shane Mosley is a classic example. Shane was a DEMON at LW, but he chased the money AKA DelaHoya all the way up to WW and jrMW. Shane was a match for DLH as DLH's skills were ALWAYS overrated IMO, but against other guys, especially those at 154, Shane's "powerboxing" style just didn't translate. It had nothing to do with Shane being "passed it" like some idiots say. Shane NEVER had the magic at WW or above like he had at LW. Its was at LW that Shane made his reputation. Ward might be the best SMW, but let's let Ward show and prove before we start acting like the Republicans that began celebrating Romney's win before the election even began. |
|
Undisputed Champion
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Zamunda
Posts: 28,946
Rep Power: 73
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| (ward, 175), got?, world |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Privacy Policy - Submit
News - Feedback
- Site Map - Advertise
with Us
Copyright © 2003-2013 BoxingScene LLC All rights reserved.