|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Boxing Champions | Boxing Schedule | Boxing Video | Boxing History | Pound For Pound | Lounge | The Wire | Audio | Arcade |
|
|
||
|
Up and Comer
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 0
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Haye dominated at Cruiserweight and moved above his natural weight class and still found success Froch is forever #2 at 168 and he doesn't have the balls to move up to 175, the little ***** would wait for Ward to surpass him even further and move up instead |
|
|
Undisputed Champion
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 1,611
Rep Power: 21
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I'm a Haye fan (we're both from SE London) but he didn't "dominate" the cruiserweight division. He beat Mormeck then Maccarinelli & then moved up. That's not dominating. That's a couple of good wins. His victory over Valuev was excellent but the rest were just so-so up til Klitschko when he was a tad disappointing. But the big thing about your post that doesn't make you look like a boxing fan is saying that "Froch doesn't have the balls to move up to 175". Why should he move from a talent laden division to a boring one? He's comfortable at Super middle. Haye was struggling to make cruiser & it's not a glamour division anyway. The heavyweight purses are generally tenfold what the Cruiserweight ones are. I love both fighters (in a manly way) but saying Froch doesn't have balls is just bizarre. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| boxrec, current |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Privacy Policy - Submit
News - Feedback
- Site Map - Advertise
with Us
Copyright © 2003-2013 BoxingScene LLC All rights reserved.