|
Golovkin is the G.O.A.T!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The driver's seat
Posts: 29,034
Points: 740,505.87
Bank: 924,326,163,050.76
Total Points: 924,326,903,556.63
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlatLine
Why should it no way be a 10-8, the whole reason for the 10 point must system is to give leeway for exactly that purpose. If a fighter gets dominated in a round and lands virtually nothing in the way of return fire, not only is it fair to score it a 10-8, it should really be the norm to give that fighter less than 9 points.
You're awarding those points based on how well the fighter performs, not only based on who wins and who loses the round. Why would a fighter who gets totally dominated in a round still deserve 9 points, when (in a different fight) a fighter who puts up a good fight but doesn't do quite enough to win the round also gets the same 9 points?
Check out the rules of the 10 point must system for a better understanding of how it works.
|
I agree with you. I give 10-8 rounds when I judge fights (sitting on my couch at home scoring) as well as 10-10 rounds if both guys do virtually nothing to stand out. I scored several rounds in the Calzaghe-Lacy fight as 10-8 rounds for Joe based on how he dominated Lacy.
|
|
|
|