Quote:
Originally Posted by Panamaniac
Frankly I don't know, but if I had to venture a guess, I would say the one (I don't remember which) that went the distance with Duran. I could research it and submit a more informed answer, but I'm somewhat indifferent toward fighters that never won a champioship. 
|
Really? So you'd take more interest in David Diaz or think more highly of Paulie malignaggi? Despite him never winning a title he was certainly, without any doubt, a greater fighter than those two and many other champions today.
Edwin I'm talking about. He was the better fighter, though both were number 1 contenders at 135 and 140.
Your whole attitude is quite the pity really. Considering just how many great fighters there are that never won a title it's sad that anyone would take this view. Especially anyone supposedly interested in history. Edwin is a great example of a guy that would have certainly won titles in today's era and maybe in many other older eras too. He was an excellent, very courageous and
very tough, boxer with great skill and his first fight against Duran is one of his most fun at lightweight. Really exciting fight.
There are so many fighters fighters that you are indifferent to just because they never won a title and yet are clearly better than a hell of a lot who did.