the entire idea behind this thread is stupid.
for this "who has the better accuracy" argument to have any merit, you would first need the premise that compubox is a perfectly (or close to it) accurate measure of punches landed and missed.
any fan of boxing can tell you this is not the case, and compubox is not completely accurate. compubox is a computer program. who enters these punch numbers into the program? someone watching the fight enters these numbers, hence human error enters the equation.
with something as high paced as pacquiao's punches, do you think a human watching the fight LIVE (on normal speed) can accurately judge ALL of the MISSED and LANDED punches? if you think so, frankly you are quite dumb.
mayweather's stats would be easier to track and thus his compubox numbers would likely be closer to the truth than pacquiao's, as he throws far fewer combinations.
so you guys just spent 70 pages debating something that is not even a fully accurate tool in the first place, and many of you arguing over a few % difference between the two? retarded.
/end thread
|