Cotto-Mayweather vs Pacquiao-Bradley: Which fight did you score closer?

[Sttag]

Originally Posted by El Angel

But not the 6th or 8th? Cotto clearly won those.

Nah, I was just sayin since most people say PBF swept the beggining and the end easy. Cotto just didn't have enough in him to close strong.

Was a good fight but I highly doubt we're all gonna watch a rematch.

[NEETzsche]

two entirely different fights. mayweather's fight with cotto was hard-fought but ultimately comfortable; i only had cotto winning two rounds, late-middle rounds that mayweather seemed to rest in so he could close strong in the championships (which he did). cotto was brave and tenacious, but he just wasn't scoring points. 10-2 mayweather.

pacquiao started slowly and allowed bradley to dictate the action in the first few rounds with his movement and jab, then bradley got injured and caught a few times, and manny claimed the bulk of the middle rounds with late rallies. bradley seemed to adjust to the power by the end, though, and clean-swept the championship rounds from a visibly gassed and diffident pacquiao. 7-5 pacquiao.

[SUPREME.]

Originally Posted by JOM'S

although imho both supposedly wins are wide and unquestionable, cotto was a little more of a challenge to floyd than bradley was to pac ...

miguel did a lot more than bradley but in both cases I dont see how anybody would think that cotto or bradley won ...

I have nothing but respect for you. You're a Pacquiao fan that actually has some sense.

To answer the topic at hand, I scored if 10-2 for Mayweather and 8-4 Pac.

[mathed]

I had Pac-Bradley 9-3 live, after the re-watch, I had it 7-5.

I had May-Cotto 8-4 live and 8-4 in the re-watch.

Both fights were pretty close but there were several additional rounds in the Pac fight I could have given to Bradley but chose not to......Pac's late round surges in those rounds impressed me slightly more than Bradley winning the rest of the round.

[El Angel]

Originally Posted by Sttag

Nah, I was just sayin since most people say PBF swept the beggining and the end easy. Cotto just didn't have enough in him to close strong.

Was a good fight but I highly doubt we're all gonna watch a rematch.

Oh understand what you're saying. Cotto did gas in the end of the fight, but I also gave him the 3rd round.

[titanium]

The world thought Cotto/Mayweather was close, only the judges thought Pacman/Bradley was close.

[littlemac]

Originally Posted by Check_hooks

Cotto 10-2 over floyd

Pac 11-1 over Bradley

Both were horrible decisions by the judges

bwhahahaha....this coming from a the same poster who made the post below!!

Originally Posted by Check_hooks

These are professional judges who have training and decades of experience and they are always within 25 feet of the action and are watching it in real life. You are a dumbass who doesn't know how to judge a boxing fight and has ZERO experience and was watching the fight on a 2-dimensional screen.

I'll take their expert judgement over yours any day.

[Frank Ducketts]

Originally Posted by titanium

The world thought Cotto/Mayweather was close, only the judges thought Pacman/Bradley was close.

No, only Pacquiao fanatics and Lampley thought the fight was close. Even Cottos fans knew the fight wasn't close. Hard fought fight, clear winner.

[lebrick]

Originally Posted by Frank Ducketts

I had 11-1 Floyd

I had Bradley 11-4
Arum 1-0 over Pacquiao

Arum 0-2 losses to Floyd and Pacquiao

bradley and pac fought in the 70's?

[straightleft]

Originally Posted by Own3d

Cotto landed harder shots and did more damage against Mayweather than Bradley did against Pacquiao, but Bradley won more rounds. People giving Bradley only 1 or 2 rounds really don't know how to score a fight.

Talking about don't know how to score a fight is you.