Ring Ratings At Welterweight Are Disgustingly Bad - Page 3

Alpha & Omega

These ratings are sickening, so is the blatant favoritism the magazine shows Pac. I love the magazine but it is ridiculous that Pac is still #1 at WW and on the P4P list, it is a travesty. It goes to show you how Floyd keeps being dumped on no matter how great he does. Pac got legitimately beaten by JMM (a guy coming up in weight) and then looked ordinary in a loss to Bradley (another guy coming up in weight), even though it was a crap decision and Pac should have won. Floyd dominated JMM, Ortiz (a bigger guy) and then moved up and dominated a full fledged JMW Cotto (a bigger guy) and he is ranked #2 LOL. This is such a joke, I can't wait until Pac retires, his nutsucking fans are making a mockery of this sport.

Light_Speed

Quote:

Originally Posted by paulf

01. Mayweather
02. Bradley
03. Pacquiao
04. Malignaggi
05. Guerrero
06. Berto
07. Brook
08. Zavec
09. Alexander
10. Bailey

....in my humble opinion

I can dig that. I'd have Bailey at 7 or 8 though.

bojangles1987

LOL at those rankings. I know WW sucks right now, but that's really inaccurate.

DempseyRollin

Kell brook does not deserve a #3 ranking. WW is bad but not that bad

bojangles1987

Quote:

Originally Posted by THE ИATAS

clearly the ring isn't recognizing his "loss" to bradley (thus why bradley is only #6 and not top 2).

But with that said I think floyd should clearly be #1 and Pac #2.

Even in losing, I don't see how someone could watch Pac-Bradley and not think Bradley is one of the best fighters at the weight. Number 6 below Malignaggi and Jan Zaveck is crazy.

285Kid

ESPN 147 Ranking

Quote:

1. Manny Pacquiao (54-4-2)
2. Timothy Bradley Jr. (29-0)
3. Andre Berto (28-1)
4. Jan Zaveck (32-2)
5. Paulie Malignaggi (31-4)
6. Robert Guerrero (30-1-1)
7. Josesito Lopez (30-4)
8. Victor Ortiz (29-4-2)
9. Kell Brook (28-0)
10. Devon Alexander (23-1)

Mayweather is #1 on 154

DempseyRollin

Quote:

Originally Posted by 285Kid

ESPN 147 Ranking

Mayweather is #1 on 154

That's much better than rings crap. I mean if Manny or Floyd could fight Kelly brook for a ring title that's downright disgusting. Wtf happened to the ring?

-Kev-

So Marquez beats Pacquiao twice, but both times get treated like the loser, and Manny the "rightful" winner.

Pacquiao loses a controversial split decision and gets ranked like the winner, and Bradley like the loser.

Double standards.

-Kev-

Lol Floyd is #1 at JMW, and #2 at WW. Greatest fighter of this era by far. Top 2 in two different weight classes

Bushbaby

Quote:

Originally Posted by -Kev-

So Marquez beats Pacquiao twice, but both times get treated like the loser, and Manny the "rightful" winner.

Pacquiao loses a controversial split decision and gets ranked like the winner, and Bradley like the loser.

Double standards.

Exactly how I feel. Pacman is being too favored.

bojangles1987 bojangles1897 Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Hudson, Fl Posts: 21,815 Rep Power: 68 Points: 257,000,122,789.77 Bank: 11,112,884,172.63 Total Points: 268,113,006,962.40 Donate	LOL at those rankings. I know WW sucks right now, but that's really inaccurate.

DempseyRollin Trolling 24/7 Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 11,503 Rep Power: 31 Points: 3,106,266,469.45 Bank: 3,478,758,096.79 Total Points: 6,585,024,566.24 Donate	Kell brook does not deserve a #3 ranking. WW is bad but not that bad

-Kev- Banned Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Caribbean Posts: 17,870 Rep Power: 0 Points: 448,746,223,344.42 Bank: 1,174,034,275,629.72 Total Points: 1,622,780,498,974.14 Donate	So Marquez beats Pacquiao twice, but both times get treated like the loser, and Manny the "rightful" winner. Pacquiao loses a controversial split decision and gets ranked like the winner, and Bradley like the loser. Double standards.