|08-10-2012, 10:40 PM||#1|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Quoted: 494 Post(s)Rep Power: 33
Total Points: 3,202,275,194,206,352,384.00
Should Peterson be allowed to keep his title?
Some of the other threads on Peterson and the IBF title have turned into Khan bashing threads. So, keeping Khan out of this one (as he has nothing to do with it) and just consentrating on the IBF's ruling...
Should Peterson be allowed to keep the IBF belt or should he be stripped..and why?
My view is he shouldn't be allowed to keep the title. He had something in his system that he wasn't allowed to have when he won the titles..so he broke the rules. It may not of even effected his performance and was probably just a silly mistake on the Peterson camps part. But rules are there to be upheld and in this case they were not.
Whats everyone else's take on this ? Please vote and explain.
Last edited by Chrismart; 08-10-2012 at 10:42 PM.
|08-10-2012, 10:48 PM||#2|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Quoted: 254 Post(s)Rep Power: 13
Total Points: 100,094,845.08
i thoought ibf was the only respectable abc bodies but not anymore after this ...they are just as bad....wbc is stil the worst tho
|08-10-2012, 11:06 PM||#8|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Quoted: 1091 Post(s)Rep Power: 75
Total Points: 1,049,672,037,849,555,402,752.00
No. Stripping him along with the personal and financial consequences he has already endured would be adequate punishment in my book though.
|08-10-2012, 11:08 PM||#9|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Quoted: 9 Post(s)Rep Power: 11
Total Points: 2,594,637.67
No he shouldn't, but I'm not really surprised by this. The IBF does have a history of being biased towards black fighters...
|Share This With Friends|
|allowed, peterson, title?|