|07-08-2012, 11:31 AM||#1|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 0
Total Points: 6,099,019,524.25
The problem with Android
The Problem With Android
Android is the leading smartphone platform with a diverse array of devices available from a variety of manufacturers, and from virtually every wireless carrier. As capable as the Android OS might be, though, its diversity is also one of its greatest handicaps.
Google recently unveiled the next major release of Android: Android 4.0 "Ice Cream Sandwich". The latest iteration of Android combines the features and capabilities of the Android 2.3 "Gingerbread" OS for smartphones, and Android 3.0 "Honeycomb" OS for tablets into an integrated OS that serves both types of devices simultaneously.
"Ice Cream Sandwich" sounds yummy, but who knows when I'll get it for my Xoom?"Ice Cream Sandwich" will soon be available on the flagship Samsung Galaxy Nexus samrtphone. If you don't rush out to get the Galaxy Nexus, though, it is a guessing game when you might be able to get an Android 4.0 update for your existing Android smartphone or tablet…or if you ever will at all. That is the problem with Android.
Motorola's latest Android phone--the Droid Razr--begins pre-orders today, and will ship to customers sometime during the first half of November. When users receive this cutting edge device, it will already be obsolete because it is built on Android 2.3.5--a variant of last year's "Gingerbread" release. Motorola promises that the Droid Razr will be updated to "Ice Cream Sandwich" in the first half of 2012. Woo hoo?
Meanwhile, owners of the initial Android showcase phone, the Google Nexus One, are just out of luck. Google has already announced that the Nexus One hardware is "too old" and the device will not be updated to Android 4.0.
It is a problem that plagues all Android devices. A chart from undertstatement.com illustrates the Android smartphone models that have been released in the United States, and how far behind most of them are in relation to the current Android release.
Compare the Android update history with iOS. The iPhone 3GS was initially launched in June of 2009. It is more than two years old, yet when iOS 5 was released it was immediately available for download for the iPhone 3GS, as well as the iPhone 4. While it took more than six months for "Gingerbread" to be deployed on a statistically significant segment of Android devices, when Apple updates iOS it generally has 90-plus percent penetration in a matter of days.
I have a Motorola Xoom tablet running "Honeycomb"--Android 3.2.1 to be exact. The Xoom is one of the standard-bearers of what Android tablets are supposed to be capable of. When "Ice Cream Sandwich" is released for the Samsung Galaxy Nexus, I would expect to be able to immediately download the new OS for my Xoom as well. I won't hold my breath.
The reality is that I will be lucky to get "Ice Cream Sandwich" on my Xoom in the next six months. Meanwhile, my original from April of 2010, and my iPad 2 are both happily running the iOS 5 update that came out a couple weeks ago.
Answering the question of why Android devices take so long to get the latest update, or don't get the update at all, the understatement.com post explains, "Obviously a big part of the problem is that Android has to go from Google to the phone manufacturers to the carriers to the devices, whereas iOS just goes from Apple directly to devices."
Vendors often claim--as Google has with the Nexus One--that the older hardware just can't keep up with the newer Android OS. The understatement.com post goes on to point out, though, that the hacker community often ports the latest OS to these devices just fine, so that argument seems to be invalid in at least some cases.
There is no denying that hardware eventually becomes obsolete, and that some older devices truly lack the horsepower and capabilities that the newer Android OS demands. On the Apple side of the fence, there are still legacy models that are no longer supported as well. It's just that they are three years or so old--not devices that were sold as cutting edge, flagship smartphones a few months ago.
Google, Android device manufacturers, and wireless carriers all need to work together to implement a more streamlined system to get the latest updates out to devices faster, and to create a more predictable environment where users can be confident that the cream-of-the-crop smartphone or tablet they are investing in won't be rendered obsolete for six months or more while it waits to catch up…just in time for the next release of Android to put it two steps behind again.
|07-08-2012, 12:50 PM||#2|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 0
Total Points: 9,790,994,985.15
1. When you copy and paste (copy other people's words) it's nice etiquette to link and source them
2. Google as a company has always been about EVERYONE using their products. They're not on a high horse like apple who over price their products intentionally and sell a culture/style before substance. That is why they have an OS that all manufacturers and carriers can offer to the wide diversity of customers from low end to high end. Google has given the chance for people who can't afford $200 top of line phones, to be able to afford a smart phone. So you as a consumer saying that having too many choices is stupid, only shows how stupid you really are. A consumer without choices is a prisoner that will be taken advantage of. Android/Google is all about choices. Shoot when you download Google Chrome for your PC, Google even gives you the option to select the default search engine you would like to use. If Google was like Apple they'd force you to use Google search as the default search engine and their be no way around it.
3. Fragmentation is good! So is having choices and you can't have one without the other. The few people like myself who are very geeky buy Galaxy Nexus phones. We get software updates that bring new technology and features twice a year!!! Most other Android users don't care to have the most cutting edge technology, although most Android users do want something that is dummied down like the iphone
4. The fact that not a lot of phones run ICS is really not a bad thing. Only Apple nerds use this stupid argument, yet they conveniently leave out that even androids "old" gingerbread 2.3 software, is a lot more advanced and innovating than iOS5, so again where's the problem?
It's like a Toyota Prius, poking fun at a V8 Supercharged Camero, because the camero is still running last years supercharger
Image View Removed. For more information, please contact our forum admins by clicking here.
|Share This With Friends|