|
Troll Destroyer
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 17,565
Points: 262,340,820.56
Bank: 1,591,748,952,534.75
Total Points: 1,592,011,293,355.31
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1Assassin
gatti was the defending champion you moron, floyd fought him to get the title. and im aware he said titles only collect dust but that was much later in his career after he won over half a dozen of them, against gatti he won his second title.
bruseles i somewhat agree with, even though to be fair thats not the same thing either. floyd wasnt a champion when he fought bruseles, he had vacated his 130lb title and hadnt picked up the 140lb title yet. so he didnt have the responsibility as a champion to defend against a worthy challenger, it was just another fight.
i agree the klitschkos dont deserve the critisism in this case but the way you made an argument for it was retarded. its not the same situation so there are no double standards.
|
Gatti was actually ranked #1 at 140 at that time, besides the Lineal Champion.
Undeservedly, mind you.
|
|
|
|