|03-28-2011, 02:24 AM||#21|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Quoted: 16 Post(s)Rep Power: 26
Total Points: 5,113,480,760,593,199.00
Snoop should have got a much better detailed tat of nate, that looks sloppy to me but its still the thought that counts
|03-28-2011, 03:11 AM||#23|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hairy Cooch
Quoted: 300 Post(s)Rep Power: 30
Total Points: 32,749,401,818,032,528.00
|03-28-2011, 04:42 AM||#24|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New York, NY
Quoted: 3327 Post(s)Rep Power: 137
Total Points: 10,001,799,807.61
Tattooing names will do, but a whole picture with quotes? I'll pass.
|03-28-2011, 04:49 AM||#26|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hunters Point CA
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 52
Total Points: 1,455,545,483,954.74
Not knocking you, just wanted to know your take on it.
|03-28-2011, 05:33 AM||#28|
Conveyor of Truth
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quoted: 71 Post(s)Rep Power: 33
Total Points: 2,000,110,741,406,571.00
1. its truly a work of art seing how hard it is to make such a perfect portrait.
2. it has a story, if we pretend nate dogg wasnt famous and someone asks about the tattoo it has a great story.
3. the story carries alot of meaning to him obviously. he cared alot about nate dogg and now he carries him with him forever.
4. it looks awesome. i already said its a work of art but damn. how come ppl can have portraits on their walls but not as tattoos?
PS: what do u consider a cool tat? cottos lobster?
|Share This With Friends|
|(pic, covers, dogg, entire, forearm, image, inside), left, nate, snoop|