One thing to consider, though... RJ was boxing at a very high level as an amateur from at least when he won the National JO's in 1984 (at 119 pounds) all the way until he fought Antonio in 2004. Thats a SOLID 20 years of non-stop training, sparring, running, pressure,etc etc. Antonio didnt even make it big in the amateurs until 1994 or 1995 after Roy had quite afew pro fights and was inhis prime... then Ant went pro in 1997... when Roy was already a pro for EIGHT full years. So they were the same age only in actuality, not in boxing terms.
While you do make a great point it still sounds like an excuse to me. You could only use that explanation with guys like barrera or Morales who have been in actual wars and blood and guts battles. You add the training, sparring, running, pressure as you said and they're used up and washed up in their early 30's ready to retire. Roy on the other hand hasn't been in any wars in that ring. He only had a few difficult fights and even then he didn't get beat up. He was basically a dominant fighter prior to meeting tarver in that ring so all the stuff you listed can't be used. Besides it's not like tarver benefited from not fighting for as long as roy has. The guy was doing drugs during his amateur days for god sake. What kind of an advantage does a fighter have if he turns pro in his late 20's (besides the heavyweights) and gets his first title shot in his mid 30's like tarver did? I'm sorry Roy is great but he blew it vs tarver. You can't excuse that
Comment