Some of you dense ****ers need constant reminders. In the first place, there are no definite criteria for "pound for pound." No one knows exactly what it means. Second, it's almost entirely subjective. Third, the commonly-cited lists each have an obvious and distinct bias.
It's a marketing tool, not an actual sporting title. Like all marketing tools, it aims at the dumbest members of society. Smart people who know boxing never refer to a "p4p list."
It's only you idiots arguing about "resumes" all day who cite "the p4p list" as if it had anything to do with boxing. It doesn't.
It's a marketing tool, not an actual sporting title. Like all marketing tools, it aims at the dumbest members of society. Smart people who know boxing never refer to a "p4p list."
It's only you idiots arguing about "resumes" all day who cite "the p4p list" as if it had anything to do with boxing. It doesn't.
Comment