Wladimir Klitschko Top 10 P4P??
Collapse
-
-
So you say Austin was smaller than Wladimir because he was 1/2 inch shorter? Wow, Wlad sure had a great size advantage!
Austin was also a half pound heavier - what about that? And elsewhere I've seen Austin listed as having a 83'' reach.
Lennox Lewis was taller and had a reach advantage over virtually all his opponents. Why do you never criticise Lennox, only Wlad?
I notice you're always negative about East European boxers, Duffgun.Last edited by The Hammer; 12-24-2007, 04:34 PM.Comment
-
So you say Austin was smaller than Wladimir because he was 1/2 inch shorter? Wow, Wlad sure had a great size advantage!
Austin was also a half pound heavier - what about that? And elsewhere I've seen Austin listed as having a 83'' reach.
Lennox Lewis was taller and had a reach advantage over virtually all his opponents. Why do you never criticise Lennox, only Wlad?
I notice you're always negative about East European boxers, Duffgun.Comment
-
Comment
-
If there's one thing you should hate it's the American and British heavyweights of today. They are unmotivated and out of shape. People should thank the Eastern Europeans for saving the division from being a total mess.
Not saying they are the best ever but they are the best today.Comment
-
Thats only 1 of his last 10 opponents and austin isn't world class so thats only 1 of his last 10 and he still had a slight advantage in height and reach. i would like to see wlad face valuev at some point to see how he does against someone bigger but i am sure he could beat valuev.Comment
-
If there's one thing you should hate it's the American and British heavyweights of today. They are unmotivated and out of shape. People should thank the Eastern Europeans for saving the division from being a total mess.
Not saying they are the best ever but they are the best today.Comment
-
Comment
-
The reason there's more threads on Wlad than Lewis is because Wlad's ACTIVE while Lewis is RETIRED. I'm surprised you couldn't figure that out!Comment
-
Comment