Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dan Rafael REVEALS his hall of fame ballot vote (see if you agree with his picks)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by CarlosG815 View Post
    I like his picks.

    Anybody complaining about Hamed doesn't know what they're talking about. Hamed is a hands down sure in Hall of Fame fighter. He was very good, Britains best of the last 20 years.


    This douchebag just stated that Naseem Hamed is better than Lennox Lewis.

    Let alone Benn and Eubank.

    Comment


    • #22
      naseem hamed? lmao....

      Comment


      • #23
        Hamed is an obvious choice. He beat many (about 10) former, current, and future champions, with only one loss by decision. Of course JCC, Tszyu, and Tyson are even more obvious.
        Last edited by Scott9945; 10-26-2010, 10:45 PM.

        Comment


        • #24
          Why have people got a problem with Hamed? He was a very good fighter and was the #1 featherweight for years, he also was very entertaining. He deserves to be in the HOF.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Sweet Jesus View Post


            This douchebag just stated that Naseem Hamed is better than Lennox Lewis.

            Let alone Benn and Eubank.
            He is eon's better than Lennox Lewis was. He actually possessed something Lewis never has - actual skills and abilities and athleticism and fought in a much tougher division.

            Keep in mind he was never KO'd, as Lewis was on two separate occasions by journeyman fighters while in the prime of his career.

            The fact that you even brought up Lewis when talking about Hamed shows you have no idea what you're talking about, as Hamed is the better fighter, and Lennox is a self proclaimed Canadian - which is who he represented in the olympics and is the country of which he is currently a citizen, IIRC.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Scott9945 View Post
              Hamed is an obvious choice. He beat many (about 10) former, current, and future champions, with only one loss by decision. Of course JCC, Tszyu, and Tyson are even more obvious.
              Originally posted by Mr. Blobby View Post
              Why have people got a problem with Hamed? He was a very good fighter and was the #1 featherweight for years, he also was very entertaining. He deserves to be in the HOF.
              With 4 belts per division, everyone is a former/current/future champion. What are the names of the guys he beat? Entertainment doesn't factor in at all in HOF voting.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Mr. Blobby View Post
                Why have people got a problem with Hamed? He was a very good fighter and was the #1 featherweight for years, he also was very entertaining. He deserves to be in the HOF.
                Because idiots like Sweet Jesus have never watched a Hamed fight in their life and go strictly off of boxrec and what they've read on this forum about him.

                They're just clueless kids.

                Comment


                • #28
                  How the hell are you gonna put Hamed in the HOF? He hasn't done a damn thing.

                  His best win was against an aging kelly, and he gave up after he finally faced a true elite fighter.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    i agree with all of them of them but.... hamed? seriously, man that is some ****ed up choice.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      The Prince lost to the only good fighter he ever fought...carry on...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP