Originally posted by The_Expert
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bradley has no chance in beating Khan when we look at the stats
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View PostLook at Kendal Holt's KO ratio, and the dude can seriously crack. See what your problem is? It's that you solely look at stats, I understand that height, speed IS something to look at, but how about other attributes, like counter punching, defense, infighting, body punching etc, what about all that other stuff?
I'm not even gonna respond to the bold.
Comment
-
are you boys ****ing serious? dude, if your tall and you fight like a tall guy than it's an advantage. Short fella's who fight short are also using height to an advantage. Has boxing proved taller=better.....look at my ****ing avatar. Kahn's taller yeah, but he doesn't stick to strictly tall fight plans. Sometime's he gets stupid and think's he can fight a short man's fight. There his height is a disadvantage. Saying he's too tall also says you don't believe he'll try too much close because if you do believe he will try to fight close at points than you'd have to give height advantage to Bradley. My point isn't to suggest Bradley will win due to being short. It's to point out that there is NO bad body type only bad fighters who never learned how to use their body correctly. Tall guys tend to make short guys look stupid as they walk into shot after shot. Inversely short guys make tall guys look like giant ******* once they've cut the ring and thrown some bombs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marchegiano View Postare you boys ****ing serious? dude, if your tall and you fight like a tall guy than it's an advantage. Short fella's who fight short are also using height to an advantage. Has boxing proved taller=better.....look at my ****ing avatar. Kahn's taller yeah, but he doesn't stick to strictly tall fight plans. Sometime's he gets stupid and think's he can fight a short man's fight. There his height is a disadvantage. Saying he's too tall also says you don't believe he'll try too much close because if you do believe he will try to fight close at points than you'd have to give height advantage to Bradley. My point isn't to suggest Bradley will win due to being short. It's to point out that there is NO bad body type only bad fighters who never learned how to use their body correctly. Tall guys tend to make short guys look stupid as they walk into shot after shot. Inversely short guys make tall guys look like giant ******* once they've cut the ring and thrown some bombs.
Comment
-
Point is bradley will get hit with 3-4 punches for every wild right hand he throws because of the speed and height advantage.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marchegiano View Postare you boys ****ing serious? dude, if your tall and you fight like a tall guy than it's an advantage. Short fella's who fight short are also using height to an advantage. Has boxing proved taller=better.....look at my ****ing avatar. Kahn's taller yeah, but he doesn't stick to strictly tall fight plans. Sometime's he gets stupid and think's he can fight a short man's fight. There his height is a disadvantage. Saying he's too tall also says you don't believe he'll try too much close because if you do believe he will try to fight close at points than you'd have to give height advantage to Bradley. My point isn't to suggest Bradley will win due to being short. It's to point out that there is NO bad body type only bad fighters who never learned how to use their body correctly. Tall guys tend to make short guys look stupid as they walk into shot after shot. Inversely short guys make tall guys look like giant ******* once they've cut the ring and thrown some bombs.
People are picking Khan because of what they percieve his ability to keep the fight long to pick up points and do damage at range. In my opinion Bradley is better then Khan at quite a few things, but he may not be able to execute those strengths because of Khans physical qualities.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The_Expert View Postthats my point. even if Bradley gets Khan in the corner he cant throw bombs because he has zero power.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marchegiano View Postare you boys ****ing serious? dude, if your tall and you fight like a tall guy than it's an advantage. Short fella's who fight short are also using height to an advantage. Has boxing proved taller=better.....look at my ****ing avatar. Kahn's taller yeah, but he doesn't stick to strictly tall fight plans. Sometime's he gets stupid and think's he can fight a short man's fight. There his height is a disadvantage. Saying he's too tall also says you don't believe he'll try too much close because if you do believe he will try to fight close at points than you'd have to give height advantage to Bradley. My point isn't to suggest Bradley will win due to being short. It's to point out that there is NO bad body type only bad fighters who never learned how to use their body correctly. Tall guys tend to make short guys look stupid as they walk into shot after shot. Inversely short guys make tall guys look like giant ******* once they've cut the ring and thrown some bombs.
Being short can count to your advantage but generally speaking it isn’t an advantage you don’t start the fight on the inside you have to work your way there and against a tall rangy fighter who throws blistering fast jabs and combinations right down the middle that is not easy.
Its called a height and reach advantage for a good reason it is an advantage.
Comment
Comment