Not if it was in a big fight, and I felt like someone was going to rig a test by paying crooked ppl off to ruin my reputation. Or not if I felt like I would be drained, since I've had blood taken from me before and I always feel weak 2 days after-wards.
There is absolutely no argument against drug testing! Regardless of what Mayweather's true motive was, it is irrelevant to the fact that many athletes have been unfairly taking advantage of performance enhancing drugs in their respective sport. Drug testing can only serve to improve the condition of boxing as a sport. We all know boxing is bad enough already; so, to argue against drug testing is stupid.
Not if it was in a big fight, and I felt like someone was going to rig a test by paying crooked ppl off to ruin my reputation. Or not if I felt like I would be drained, since I've had blood taken from me before and I always feel weak 2 days after-wards.
Olympic athletes seem fine competing under these same conditions. Besides, it has been shown that there is no direct correlation between drawing blood from an athlete and their ability to perform. Also, it's not like only one fighter is going to be taking the test, it's both of them. I have no idea how anyone can argue against blood testing!
Let's make thing clear first, no one is arguing with the blood testing. it is only the cut off date in question. someone needs to get it to their head.
Comment