Clearly it found a petrified dragon egg. Y'all stupid.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Curiosity makes a discover "for the history books"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by -Kev- View PostNow that's impressive. Dudes made a robot with it's own lab that can identify things. That's something I never read in the past. I thought it was just a robot with a camera and a laser.
Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View PostSince when did MSNBC become a credible source of news?
Comment
-
Originally posted by squealpiggy View PostWell yes, they're obviously biased toward liberal robotics scientists. The Conservative robot scientists are obviously going to be pissed and everything because of lack of coverage of their Noah's Ark robots.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View PostFine, when did MSNBC become a credible source of information? You are, after all, one of those who refers to Fox News as Faux and MSNBC makes Fox look downright trustworthy. Cute portrayal of all conservatives as religious wackjobs though, how positively nonpartisan of you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View PostFine, when did MSNBC become a credible source of information? You are, after all, one of those who refers to Fox News as Faux and MSNBC makes Fox look downright trustworthy. Cute portrayal of all conservatives as religious wackjobs though, how positively nonpartisan of you.
Well, it's nonpartisan except to religious wackjobs.
http://www.geek.com/articles/news/ma...ooks-20121120/
If that makes you feel better. The initial story was picked up by Huffington Post who were talking to some of NASA's scientists about the project. It's more of interest to geologists than to biologists though so it might have more to do with indicators of water than actual indicators of life.
One of the scientists involved did make the valid statement that the entire mission is one for the history books.
I make no apology for my enthusiasm. I understand you're still inexplicably upset about the election, but still no need to have a tantrum about the use of MSNBC as a handy link to a tech story.
Comment
-
Originally posted by squealpiggy View PostI'm not sure what your primary beef is here. It's not like NASA is a partisan issue and there is an area of debate as to whether Curiosity is finding stuff on Mars. I could understand if this was to do with healthcare or the economy or something but science is a nonpartisan issue.
Well, it's nonpartisan except to religious wackjobs.
http://www.geek.com/articles/news/ma...ooks-20121120/
If that makes you feel better. The initial story was picked up by Huffington Post who were talking to some of NASA's scientists about the project. It's more of interest to geologists than to biologists though so it might have more to do with indicators of water than actual indicators of life.
One of the scientists involved did make the valid statement that the entire mission is one for the history books.
I make no apology for my enthusiasm. I understand you're still inexplicably upset about the election, but still no need to have a tantrum about the use of MSNBC as a handy link to a tech story.Last edited by Jim Jeffries; 11-21-2012, 11:26 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by squealpiggy View PostI'm not sure what your primary beef is here. It's not like NASA is a partisan issue and there is an area of debate as to whether Curiosity is finding stuff on Mars. I could understand if this was to do with healthcare or the economy or something but science is a nonpartisan issue.
Well, it's nonpartisan except to religious wackjobs.
http://www.geek.com/articles/news/ma...ooks-20121120/
If that makes you feel better. The initial story was picked up by Huffington Post who were talking to some of NASA's scientists about the project. It's more of interest to geologists than to biologists though so it might have more to do with indicators of water than actual indicators of life.
One of the scientists involved did make the valid statement that the entire mission is one for the history books.
I make no apology for my enthusiasm. I understand you're still inexplicably upset about the election, but still no need to have a tantrum about the use of MSNBC as a handy link to a tech story.
I mean really. Do I need to remind you about the whole "Neutrinos break the speed of light" fiasco? I mean the original report by the scientists basically said. We suspect there is a flaw somewhere in our experiment, PLEASE SOMEONE HELP US FIND IT!
News took that, ran with it! EINSTEIN PROVEN WRONG!!!!! LIGHT SPEED NO LONGER FASTEST!!!!!! etc...
Then we have all the studies about... well... everything... that have be misrepresented by the news. I mean if we go by the news, I am sure that Chocolate and Wine are the cure for just about every disease on the planet...
Comment
-
Comment