Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

[treason1]

i am unbiased and i can honestly say i saw nothing wrong with the hbo broadcasting of the fight

in fact the only people i sawed criticizing lampley and crew are well known manny haters. in the past i wouldve said they were scum bags just like floyd . but since ive found religion i will refrain from saying such things and instead i will pray for them


no one in their right mind can say bradley won that fight . and lampley is just a mere man hes not perfect like jesus . even he can make a few bad calls or mistakes in his commentary it still doesnt take away from the fact that bradley lost and did so clearly


too bad the judges were paid off by floyd . i pray they come clean and admit their rong doings

[Primera]

HBO bias was sickening.

I hope someone sends that video to Lampley.

[JK1700]

Very good video. People should boycott the HBO announcers until they are replaced because to say that they are a joke would be a gross understatement. They are far worse than that and I stopped listening to them a long time ago. They don't have any credibility with me. The sad part is that Jim Lampley actually knows boxing very well, but for some reason he just chooses to be a cheerleading idiot in a desperate attempt to influence the viewer to believe that something is happening when it isn't, and of course that the people he is biased towards are much better than is actually the case.

Two things stood out while I was watching the video.

First of all that the commentators are completely 100% biased towards Manny Pacquiao and against his opponent. So much so that when he throws punches and misses them all, they go crazy like he is putting a serious hurting on Bradley. But when Bradley lands 4-5 clean punches that push Manny back, they completely ignore it like nothing happened. They're not just biased. They are flat out liars who will ignore the truth and come up with myths to influence you.

The second thing is how sloppy Manny Pacquiao is in the ring. The slow motion replays really illustrate that this guy is nothing more than a wild brawler with great stamina but very poor technique and zero defence. And what's funny is that he gets made to look like an amatuer and miss like crazy by people who have never been known for having good defence (like Shane Mosley). People say things like "Well how can you be happy? This ruined the Mayweather fight!" but we all know that Manny's decision makers weren't going to make that fight happen, and if it did happen, I think we would all look back on it and think "How did I get tricked into thinking that this guy was on Mayweather's level?". People laughed when Floyd said it would be easier than the Marquez fight but I think it would be easier. Pacquiao is so sloppy, one dimensional and lacking in ring intelligence that Floyd would just counter the **** out of him and probably stop him in 8 rounds or less. It wouldn't be competitive at all.

The Pacquiao-Bradley fight was not a robbery by any stretch of the imagination. It was a close fight with close rounds. I think more than anything people are just shocked that Manny didn't get another gift after the Marquez robbery but what goes around comes around and in my opinion that decision was a far worse one than this so nobody should be feeling sorry for him.

[chris2142]

great video hbo always up for paq i was only thinking of that a few days ago remember marques first fight lederman had him 5 rounds ahead after 12 rounds that fight was a draw we are getting brainwashed by hbo

[Spoon23]

saw it live- scored it easy for Manny
saw the replay when I got home- scored it easy for Manny
watched it against Saturday sound at a barely audible level- scored it easy for Manny

IMO for too many people are trying to find justifiable ways to edge Bradley in victory

no sound, different commentators, 1080p, super slow mo, eyes squinted etc etc

if we're trying that hard.....

These fan haters who had it for Bradley just can't accept the truth. The more they talk the more the more they look silly. Everyone in the whole entire world who knows and understands boxing knows Pac won easy. They can't accept the truth. It's obviously clinging to justify the unjustifiable lol..Get of the hatorade fanboys

Here's a 10 min highlight flick of the fight for those who don't get it..

[IMG][/IMG]

[Spoon23]

Best punch of Pac in the fight.

If he was a lesser man than Hatton he would have gone down. THis prove he has a better jaw than Hatton. This really showed how PAc hattoned him with that left hook. Same as how he droped Hatton, but in this case Bradley took it like a man.



His head got rocked. Pac Clocked him good.

Look at how bradley tried to get his right in, Pac measured him by millimeters in evading the right by a hair, and brought his left with vicious intent.

[Spoon23]

May have already been posted. If not:

This says it all. These casino's can't have it in their conscience to swindle gamblers with their hard earned money. They know Pac won it easy.

[joe strong]

Very good video. People should boycott the HBO announcers until they are replaced because to say that they are a joke would be a gross understatement. They are far worse than that and I stopped listening to them a long time ago. They don't have any credibility with me. The sad part is that Jim Lampley actually knows boxing very well, but for some reason he just chooses to be a cheerleading idiot in a desperate attempt to influence the viewer to believe that something is happening when it isn't, and of course that the people he is biased towards are much better than is actually the case.

Two things stood out while I was watching the video.

First of all that the commentators are completely 100% biased towards Manny Pacquiao and against his opponent. So much so that when he throws punches and misses them all, they go crazy like he is putting a serious hurting on Bradley. But when Bradley lands 4-5 clean punches that push Manny back, they completely ignore it like nothing happened. They're not just biased. They are flat out liars who will ignore the truth and come up with myths to influence you.

The second thing is how sloppy Manny Pacquiao is in the ring. The slow motion replays really illustrate that this guy is nothing more than a wild brawler with great stamina but very poor technique and zero defence. And what's funny is that he gets made to look like an amatuer and miss like crazy by people who have never been known for having good defence (like Shane Mosley). People say things like "Well how can you be happy? This ruined the Mayweather fight!" but we all know that Manny's decision makers weren't going to make that fight happen, and if it did happen, I think we would all look back on it and think "How did I get tricked into thinking that this guy was on Mayweather's level?". People laughed when Floyd said it would be easier than the Marquez fight but I think it would be easier. Pacquiao is so sloppy, one dimensional and lacking in ring intelligence that Floyd would just counter the **** out of him and probably stop him in 8 rounds or less. It wouldn't be competitive at all.

The Pacquiao-Bradley fight was not a robbery by any stretch of the imagination. It was a close fight with close rounds. I think more than anything people are just shocked that Manny didn't get another gift after the Marquez robbery but what goes around comes around and in my opinion that decision was a far worse one than this so nobody should be feeling sorry for him.

you want to hear bias nuthugging listen to BJ flores during adamek\chambers...

[BoxingGenius27]

My thing is this.

How did Ledderman have the Hatton-Mayweather fight close like he did, but not the Pac-Bradley fight?

[americanbot]

i dunno if id call the fight close, but it wasnt a blow out and pac might have been robbed, but it was a swing of 3 rounds at the most that won him the fight imo

nah, i would say it's exactly what it was (a toss up fight)

i have no problem with ether man getting the close win.............