Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama visits germany for speech.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/1559151.stm

    Hijack 'suspects' alive and well



    A man called Waleed Al Shehri says he left the US a year ago

    Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well.

    The iden****** of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.

    Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September.

    His photograph was released, and has since appeared in newspapers and on television around the world.

    Hijacking suspects
    Flight 175: Marwan Al-Shehhi, Fayez Ahmed, Mohald Alshehri, Hamza Alghamdi and Ahmed Alghamdi
    Flight 11: Waleed M Alshehri, Wail Alshehri, Mohamed Atta, Abdulaziz Alomari and Satam Al Suqami
    Flight 77: Khalid Al-Midhar, Majed Moqed, Nawaq Alhamzi, Salem Alhamzi and Hani Hanjour
    Flight 93: Ahmed Alhaznawi, Ahmed Alnami, Ziad Jarrahi and Saeed Alghamdi
    Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco.

    He told journalists there that he had nothing to do with the attacks on New York and Washington, and had been in Morocco when they happened. He has contacted both the Saudi and American authorities, according to Saudi press reports.

    He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Daytona Beach in the United States, and is indeed the same Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI has been referring.

    But, he says, he left the United States in September last year, became a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines and is currently on a further training course in Morocco.

    Mistaken identity

    Abdulaziz Al Omari, another of the Flight 11 hijack suspects, has also been quoted in Arab news reports.

    Abdelaziz Al Omari
    Abdelaziz Al Omari 'lost his passport in Denver'
    He says he is an engineer with Saudi Telecoms, and that he lost his passport while studying in Denver.

    Another man with exactly the same name surfaced on the pages of the English-language Arab News.

    The second Abdulaziz Al Omari is a pilot for Saudi Arabian Airlines, the report says.

    Meanwhile, Asharq Al Awsat newspaper, a London-based Arabic daily, says it has interviewed Saeed Alghamdi.

    Khalid Al-Midhar
    Khalid Al-Midhar may also be alive

    He was listed by the FBI as a hijacker in the United flight that crashed in Pennsylvania.

    And there are suggestions that another suspect, Khalid Al Midhar, may also be alive.

    FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.

    Comment


    • #22
      Alex jones predicts 9/11 2 months before.



      Comment


      • #23
        This is William Rodriguez.He was one of the survivors.He was in the building so he`s a witness.His words was tooken completely out of context by the media.And they are afraid to do a real interview with him.


        He even feels 9/11 is an inside job based on what he experienced and other facts like put option stocks put on planes , suspicious insurance that was put on the buildings shortly before 9/11 and collected insurance payment ,the fact that many building experts,fireman,airforce people,believe a plane could have done that to the building.

        Theirs also other witnesses that you could find on you tube that said planes went off in the building that did`nt come from the plane.They were in the building and the media refuse to interview them


        9/11 was an excuse to go to war with other countries so the U.S can take over other countries over and steal their natural resources like oil and also crack down on our civil liberties.look how much freedom the west lost so far
        based on this fraudulent war on Terrorism"

        That`s what all these wars are for.Wake the f up people.






        This is part 1, watch the other parts on youtube.

        Last edited by flodistheshizle; 07-25-2008, 12:47 PM.

        Comment


        • #24
          I do like Alex Jones and his movies.....

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by jabsRstiff View Post
            MikeTyson77-

            Every post you make, shaves an I.Q. point from the original starting point of 102. With almost 10K's worth of posts in the bank, you are history's dumbest person. Good thing stupidity is a bottomless pit....you can keep posting.

            Scap, Raesaad....what's up ?
            Jab you stud!

            Hey that Cotto guy aint that bad a fighter huh.

            Comment


            • #26
              9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!







              And no, i did`nt say that planes did`nt crash like those agents say to try to discredit us.

              Since the 1960`s or earlier America had the ability to fly planes remotely.
              Last edited by flodistheshizle; 07-25-2008, 12:46 PM.

              Comment


              • #27
                http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1


                U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba
                Book: U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba
                By David Ruppe
                N E W Y O R K, May 1, 2001

                55 comments
                FONT SIZE
                EMAIL
                PRINT
                SHARE
                RSS

                In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba.

                Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.

                The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba's then new leader, communist Fidel Castro.

                America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation."

                Details of the plans are described in Body of Secrets (Doubleday), a new book by investigative reporter James Bamford about the history of America's largest spy agency, the National Security Agency. However, the plans were not connected to the agency, he notes.

                The plans had the written approval of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy's defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they apparently were rejected by the civilian leadership and have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years.

                "These were Joint Chiefs of Staff documents. The reason these were held secret for so long is the Joint Chiefs never wanted to give these up because they were so embarrassing," Bamford told ABCNEWS.com.

                "The whole point of a democracy is to have leaders responding to the public will, and here this is the complete reverse, the military trying to trick the American people into a war that they want but that nobody else wants."

                Gunning for War

                The documents show "the Joint Chiefs of Staff drew up and approved plans for what may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government," writes Bamford.

                Comment


                • #28
                  continued:

                  The Joint Chiefs even proposed using the potential death of astronaut John Glenn during the first attempt to put an American into orbit as a false pretext for war with Cuba, the documents show.

                  Should the rocket explode and kill Glenn, they wrote, "the objective is to provide irrevocable proof … that the fault lies with the Communists et all Cuba [sic]."

                  The plans were motivated by an intense desire among senior military leaders to depose Castro, who seized power in 1959 to become the first communist leader in the Western Hemisphere — only 90 miles from U.S. shores.

                  The earlier CIA-backed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba by Cuban exiles had been a disastrous failure, in which the military was not allowed to provide firepower.The military leaders now wanted a shot at it.

                  "The whole thing was so bizarre," says Bamford, noting public and international support would be needed for an invasion, but apparently neither the American public, nor the Cuban public, wanted to see U.S. troops deployed to drive out Castro.

                  Reflecting this, the U.S. plan called for establishing prolonged military — not democratic — control over the island nation after the invasion.

                  "That's what we're supposed to be freeing them from," Bamford says. "The only way we would have succeeded is by doing exactly what the Russians were doing all over the world, by imposing a government by tyranny, basically what we were accusing Castro himself of doing."

                  'Over the Edge'

                  The Joint Chiefs at the time were headed by Eisenhower appointee Army Gen. Lyman L. Lemnitzer, who, with the signed plans in hand made a pitch to McNamara on March 13, 1962, recommending Operation Northwoods be run by the military.

                  Whether the Joint Chiefs' plans were rejected by McNamara in the meeting is not clear. But three days later, President Kennedy told Lemnitzer directly there was virtually no possibility of ever using overt force to take Cuba, Bamford reports. Within months, Lemnitzer would be denied another term as chairman and transferred to another job.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    The secret plans came at a time when there was distrust in the military leadership about their civilian leadership, with leaders in the Kennedy administration viewed as too liberal, insufficiently experienced and soft on communism. At the same time, however, there real were concerns in American society about their military overstepping its bounds.

                    There were reports U.S. military leaders had encouraged their subordinates to vote conservative during the election.

                    And at least two popular books were published focusing on a right-wing military leadership pushing the limits against government policy of the day.

                    The Senate Foreign Relations Committee published its own report on right-wing extremism in the military, warning a "considerable danger" in the "education and propaganda activities of military personnel" had been uncovered. The committee even called for an examination of any ties between Lemnitzer and right-wing groups. But Congress didn't get wind of Northwoods, says Bamford.

                    "Although no one in Congress could have known at the time," he writes, "Lemnitzer and the Joint Chiefs had quietly slipped over the edge."

                    Even after Lemnitzer was gone, he writes, the Joint Chiefs continued to plan "pretext" operations at least through 1963.

                    One idea was to create a war between Cuba and another Latin American country so that the United States could intervene. Another was to pay someone in the Castro government to attack U.S. forces at the Guantanamo naval base — an act, which Bamford notes, would have amounted to treason. And another was to fly low level U-2 flights over Cuba, with the intention of having one shot down as a pretext for a war.

                    "There really was a worry at the time about the military going off crazy and they did, but they never succeeded, but it wasn't for lack of trying," he says.

                    After 40 Years

                    Ironically, the documents came to light, says Bamford, in part because of the 1992 Oliver Stone film JFK, which examined the possibility of a conspiracy behind the assassination of President Kennedy.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      As public interest in the assassination swelled after JFK's release, Congress passed a law designed to increase the public's access to government records related to the assassination.

                      The author says a friend on the board tipped him off to the documents.

                      Afraid of a congressional investigation, Lemnitzer had ordered all Joint Chiefs documents related to the Bay of Pigs destroyed, says Bamford. But somehow, these remained.

                      "The scary thing is none of this stuff comes out until 40 years after," says Bamford.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP