I'm curious what the term 'p4p' means to you.
I read several explanations on various sites and by boxing writers.
One of them state 'p4p is regardless of weight, who is better, or if they fought at the same size.
That doesn't make much sense, because a 5'10 Tyson will literally destroy a 5'10 Wladimir or even a 5'10 Lewis.
Part of what make Wlad and Lennox so great is their ability to fight tall and use their superior size.
That being said a 6'5 Tyson might not be able to beat a 6'5-6'6 Lewis or Wlad. Simply because it nullifys his own style.....
Or does p4p means simply as another boxing writer puts it:
The most skilled overall.
No h2h comparisons. Just the most skilled overall.
Or is it dominance of current performance/resume?
I read several explanations on various sites and by boxing writers.
One of them state 'p4p is regardless of weight, who is better, or if they fought at the same size.
That doesn't make much sense, because a 5'10 Tyson will literally destroy a 5'10 Wladimir or even a 5'10 Lewis.
Part of what make Wlad and Lennox so great is their ability to fight tall and use their superior size.
That being said a 6'5 Tyson might not be able to beat a 6'5-6'6 Lewis or Wlad. Simply because it nullifys his own style.....
Or does p4p means simply as another boxing writer puts it:
The most skilled overall.
No h2h comparisons. Just the most skilled overall.
Or is it dominance of current performance/resume?
Comment