So many great names: Wilde, Welsh, Kid Lewis, Lennox Lewis, Fitzsimmons (first man to hold the MW and HW championships of the world), Calzaghe (some may not like this). Eubank can not be forgotten for his role in the SMW division and on his day, one of the greatest fighters of the division, ever.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who is the Greatest Fighter out the UK Ever?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by FrankieBruno View PostHatton, Joe and Naz dont belong on the greatest list
Comment
-
Originally posted by Prince_Pugilist View PostHatton, no, Joe, yes. Naz a may be, one of the greatest featherweights of all time and after Lewis the second best British boxer of the 90s. How can you not be impressed by his winning of every belt in the division? He was officially recognised as the lineal FW champ, which in this day and age is a rarity. His only loss came to an ATG in Barrera. The downside is he never attempted at a rematch, then again his desire and his hands could no longer keep him going in the most brutal of sports. He still managed to walk away a champion.
Naz could have been one of the greatest, he had all the tools, but his love for the sport and hand injuries ended his career and we were robbed of seeing him against other great boxers at the time, many who whom he could have beat.
Comment
-
The same Joe Calzaghe that was advised not to turn professional because of his hand injuries and did virtually no sparring to save them from further damage? Still, without the sparring he still showed a great ability to adapt to whatever his opponent brought.
His win over Hopkins looks even better now after what he did against Pavlik but he does suffer from a lack of good names on his resume. Not to mention Calzaghe was himself 37 when the pair met.
Not a bad record considering his hands were so messed up and that's your main asset in the ring. For that reason alone, Calzaghe deserves a lot of credit.
Comment
-
Originally posted by D-MiZe View PostThe same Joe Calzaghe that was advised not to turn professional because of his hand injuries and did virtually no sparring to save them from further damage? Still, without the sparring he still showed a great ability to adapt to whatever his opponent brought.
His win over Hopkins looks even better now after what he did against Pavlik but he does suffer from a lack of good names on his resume. Not to mention Calzaghe was himself 37 when the pair met.
Not a bad record considering his hands were so messed up and that's your main asset in the ring. For that reason alone, Calzaghe deserves a lot of credit.
he doesnt have a bad record, but its not on par with l. lewis, kid lewis, fitzsimmons, buchanan, turpin, wilde etc. he doesnt belong in the discussion with them about who is the best greatest british fighter ever.
from an all time perspective he belongs amongst the second rate guys like eubank, naz, froch, conteh, mcguigan etc. all fighters with solid legacies but who arent on the same level as the very best brittain has ever produced.
if this was about composing a list of the 10 or 15 best british fighters you could throw calzaghes name in there. but the man asked which fighters can rival lewis for the #1 spot, anyone who thinks calzaghe does that is a damn fool.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Prince_Pugilist View PostHatton, no, Joe, yes. Naz a may be, one of the greatest featherweights of all time and after Lewis the second best British boxer of the 90s. How can you not be impressed by his winning of every belt in the division? He was officially recognised as the lineal FW champ, which in this day and age is a rarity. His only loss came to an ATG in Barrera. The downside is he never attempted at a rematch, then again his desire and his hands could no longer keep him going in the most brutal of sports. He still managed to walk away a champion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by #1Assassin View Postcalzaghe wouldnt have so many hand injurys if he didnt slap with his hooks. i dont see why you would give someone extra credit for never learning how to throw a certain punch correctly and mess up both his hands. whatever handicap he had he brought on himself.
he doesnt have a bad record, but its not on par with l. lewis, kid lewis, fitzsimmons, buchanan, turpin, wilde etc. he doesnt belong in the discussion with them about who is the best greatest british fighter ever.
from an all time perspective he belongs amongst the second rate guys like eubank, naz, froch, conteh, mcguigan etc. all fighters with solid legacies but who arent on the same level as the very best brittain has ever produced.
if this was about composing a list of the 10 or 15 best british fighters you could throw calzaghes name in there. but the man asked which fighters can rival lewis for the #1 spot, anyone who thinks calzaghe does that is a damn fool.
I couldn't care what the topic is called, we're having a discussion about more than just #1 Brit here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by D-MiZe View PostYou do realise he slapped to protect his hands?
I couldn't care what the topic is called, we're having a discussion about more than just #1 Brit here.
joe often threw power punches without making contact with the target properly, not just those ***gy flurries.
some of his slap attacks were perhaps to protect his hands, but some were just poorly executed punches that made his injurys worse. not that his slap attacks werent poor technique also.Last edited by #1Assassin; 01-05-2013, 08:49 AM.
Comment
Comment