Ok so your basing suspicion level on what, a 40 second video? Outside of speculation, what creditable information has been produced to support the theory?
What PED test has Floyd ever ran from?
Why does it need to be 4 hours of footage? A lot of crimes get solved on a tiny shred of evidence. Sometimes that little clue can make a picture look different. It's how you read and interpret things & we are all built differently and have different minds, naturally we have both drawn different conclusions here. To you it's face value, to me, it's a little different.
I'm not saying he's guilty, all I'm saying is that 40 second clip made me sit back and re-consider things
Edit: I think i should get a prize for using the word different 1 million times
Ok so your basing suspicion level on what, a 40 second video? Outside of speculation, what creditable information has been produced to support the theory?
yeah, just like Peterson asking for better testing and gest busted... Same as Berto... It does not mean that if you introduced better testing, you are clean.
Why does it need to be 4 hours of footage? A lot of crimes get solved on a tiny shred of evidence. Sometimes that little clue can make a picture look different. It's how you read and interpret things & we are all built differently and have different minds, naturally we have both drawn different conclusions here. To you it's face value, to me, it's a little different.
I'm not saying he's guilty, all I'm saying is that 40 second clip made me sit back and re-consider things
Edit: I think i should get a prize for using the word different 1 million times
I have questions about anyone who watched the video and didn't think something was off. His whole aura changed. Then again, half of the people declaring him guilty after that 5-second clip are the same ones who defended Pacquiao through every distortion, nonsense, contradiction and other crap he used. People on these boards are hilarious.
Why does it need to be 4 hours of footage? A lot of crimes get solved on a tiny shred of evidence. Sometimes that little clue can make a picture look different. It's how you read and interpret things & we are all built differently and have different minds, naturally we have both drawn different conclusions here. To you it's face value, to me, it's a little different.
I'm not saying he's guilty, all I'm saying is that 40 second clip made me sit back and re-consider things
Edit: I think i should get a prize for using the word different 1 million times
I get it, but what else could Floyd have done to prove he was a clean athlete in a era of sports tainted by PED's? He didn't have to take any tests, he didn't even have to ask Manny to test, he could have just juiced, turnt his lights out in 2010', and he STILL would get the same criticism based of SPECULATION.
I have questions about anyone who watched the video and didn't think something was off. His whole aura changed. Then again, half of the people declaring him guilty after that 5-second clip are the same ones who defended Pacquiao through every distortion, nonsense, contradiction and other crap he used. People on these boards are hilarious.
Oh man, the amount of red flags Pacquiao has over him is ridiculous, it's borderline hilarious. Again, no proof as of yet, but by god am I highly suspicious
I have questions about anyone who watched the video and didn't think something was off. His whole aura changed. Then again, half of the people declaring him guilty after that 5-second clip are the same ones who defended Pacquiao through every distortion, nonsense, contradiction and other crap he used. People on these boards are hilarious.
Yeah Floyd was totally unprepared for that one. He had no clear answer.
Comment