my list is
1-Floyd
2-Pac
3-Sergio
4-Ward (though I could argue his is 3)
5- Wlad
I think people hold Pac & Floyd to a huge standard. So Pac has close fights with 2 beast in JMM & Bradley in which I thought he won both but either way they were close and he drops way down the P4P list. Yet Dawson loses to Pascal and has mad tough fights with a 50 yo fighter and he jumps way up on the list? Explain that to me.
Ward is a beast but still pretty much only fights in Oakland and hasnt beaten anyone at a higher weight. That definitely isnt mandatory but at the same time I do give Pac & Floyd extra points for that. Furthmore, as much as people sweat what a guy like Ward has done, JMM & Bradley are still better to me than anyone he has fought.
If Pac's name wasnt Pac then everyone would be sweating a guy who just fought like that against Bradley & JMM. Its too much bias & hate in boxing. Stop holding these guys to different standards. Its just like right now there is only like 2 guys Floyd can fight and get credit for. Any other fight is a garbage win.
Yet if any of the other top guys fought those other guys, people on this site would give them mad props for those wins and call them big fights. Its a joke how the fans dont realize this.
Right now I think Ward is probably or maybe better than Pac but he hasnt fully proven that yet. I also think Dawson could beat Ward if healthy at the weight but as of right now those guys havent knocked Pac off that spot IMO. If you have them there then thats fine and can be debated but its sickening to me listen to guys crapping all over people who still have Pac rated high like he is so scrub or is fighting bums
1-Floyd
2-Pac
3-Sergio
4-Ward (though I could argue his is 3)
5- Wlad
I think people hold Pac & Floyd to a huge standard. So Pac has close fights with 2 beast in JMM & Bradley in which I thought he won both but either way they were close and he drops way down the P4P list. Yet Dawson loses to Pascal and has mad tough fights with a 50 yo fighter and he jumps way up on the list? Explain that to me.
Ward is a beast but still pretty much only fights in Oakland and hasnt beaten anyone at a higher weight. That definitely isnt mandatory but at the same time I do give Pac & Floyd extra points for that. Furthmore, as much as people sweat what a guy like Ward has done, JMM & Bradley are still better to me than anyone he has fought.
If Pac's name wasnt Pac then everyone would be sweating a guy who just fought like that against Bradley & JMM. Its too much bias & hate in boxing. Stop holding these guys to different standards. Its just like right now there is only like 2 guys Floyd can fight and get credit for. Any other fight is a garbage win.
Yet if any of the other top guys fought those other guys, people on this site would give them mad props for those wins and call them big fights. Its a joke how the fans dont realize this.
Right now I think Ward is probably or maybe better than Pac but he hasnt fully proven that yet. I also think Dawson could beat Ward if healthy at the weight but as of right now those guys havent knocked Pac off that spot IMO. If you have them there then thats fine and can be debated but its sickening to me listen to guys crapping all over people who still have Pac rated high like he is so scrub or is fighting bums
Comment